That clause is "Don't make any movies about them within a certain number of years", this is well known.

I guess this is supposed to be a joke? It just looks like you're missing the point by saying that an out of shape man with odd proportions somehow shows how stupid the zero suit is.

OMG THEY FOUND A GLITCH AND AREN'T PLAYING THE GAME THE WAY I WANT THEM TO! WHY ARE THEY MAKING VIDEOS WHERE THEY BEAT THE GAME WITHOUT USING MY ARBITRARY SET OF STANDARDS!?!

By that logic it's impossible to cosplay as the Red Scout.

Like I said, the rights probably aren't for sale.

Mike, you seem to be taking CinemaSins too seriously. The Spiderman 2 article had an actual count of the number of sins mentioned in the text, showing that who ever wrote it is completely missing the point of CinemaSins. It's not supposed to be taken seriously.

The rights probably aren't for sale.

The costume actually makes all the stuff he's doing seem not that impressive. Rather than watching a guy do really cool parkour, it's like watching a really shitty Spiderman.

I think I would've been happy if my dad cared whether I was alive or not, let alone seeing him and playing video games with him.

Contradicting your last post there. The lack of understanding was incredibly evident, hence all the glaring mistakes.

Repeating the mistakes and lies you made last time, e.g. the Catalyst is a DEM (it isn't) the Catalyst solves the situation (it doesn't, the Crucible does) and the endings are all the same apart from all of their differences (lolwhut), really isn't helping your case. Mixing that in with thinking the Geth/Quarian…

Difference between not like something, and logical falacies and lies to back up your opinion?

Nonsense. I was spot on there with the difficult decision, and I'm spot on here. You backpedaled, lied, changed your argument, tried to divert attention, all because you couldn't back up anything you were saying. You even resorted to the MIND NUMBING strategy of trying to accuse those who, rightly, called you out on…

Well there's a show I wont be watching.

This isn't about my opinion. Trying to turn the tables is an amateur tactic soley for the purpose of not having to defend yours anymore, made even more obvious by your attempt to make it seem like I'm "trolling" because I pointed out all the numerous logical flaws in yours.

Can't defend your point anymore eh? Didn't take you long to stop trying to justify your lack of understanding and massive logical errors like "they were basically the same if you ignore all the differences".

I LOVE how you say they "basically have the same results but". I love it when people say that, it's just admiting you're lying because you think it's funny or something? "Oh yeah they're all exactly the same. If you ignore all the things that make them different of course". Logic, apparently.

Way to not counter anything I said.

You don't have to explain everything, but not giving an motivation for the bad guys, the driving force behind the entire series, is lazy, lazy writting. Good thing Bioware never went that route, it'd be INCREDIBLY transparent if they did.

Keep thinking that "unfathomable" actually means that, and not the reality, which is "shit we can't think of a motivation for the Reapers so lets just not make one". AKA lazy writing 101.