I'm in the same boat... but maybe its because I never caught on to the SMH idiom. Is its connotation specifically disapproving and negative? My first reaction to the term is that it implies confusion. It even comes across as a bit lighthearted.

At first I was thinking how much fun it would be to try to convince John Nash to fly into town and take the test with you. Then I realized how amazing it would be in the scenario of the single test question. It would give him the freedom to just expound on a single idea for 45 minutes or so, and you could spend the…

I mean, how could you take away anything but that from it... right?

Not just some, many! This falls into a special zone though, because the majority of cases of prostate cancer are so minor that they are effectively controlled without surgery. It quickly becomes a very muddy issue... Do you take the 95% cure-chance that comes with a 50% side-effect chance, or do you take the 85%…

And I appreciate the education! The etymology nerd in me is delighted to see that it originates from the idea that someone wearing shoes with rounded heels would be easy to push over, and might easily find themselves in the horizontal position.

Round-heeled? Huh, if someone told me that and I didn't have quick access to google, I would assume that somehow the conversation deviated into footwear and gait characteristics. It would be extra confusing if it were to come up with a woman I'd just started talking to at a bar.

I believe in you!

Millions of other people hold the opinion that McDonald's is great food too.

I really appreciated this. I lived under a similar situation for a year. The couple enjoyed getting their moisture-style touches on at 6am... on the weekends. I would wake up from the most overtly erotic dream, and my conscious would slowly realize that it was because of what I was hearing occur ~9 feet over my head.…

Sean Bean and Aaron Eckhart laugh at your foolish 'science'. (trying to post their comparison shot just gave me a big broken link dammit, so here you go: https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/212049…)

That's... a remarkably good way of putting it. Wow!

Thank you. Halfway through reading the above post I stopped and thought 'this information is completely worthless without a map showing the male half of the study'. With both pieces, its actually really interesting (and more than a little shocking).

Fine then, to the original French version!

She's going much too fast... give her a copy of In Search of Lost Time. That'll slow her down!

I think the fact that his last two girlfriends were underage was key. It seems quite possible that younger and less experienced females were less likely to be aware of the fact that the sex was bad.

To be fair, the prior day he tried to put up on the sign:

A fool and money are easily parted.

Wearing that T-shirt makes you an immediate target, you'd better watch out for rampaging South Africans.

Where my gerunds at?

Wait, you lust after Reggie Watts? I mean you do know that he likes women, he likes women, he likes the concept of a woman. He likes to take that concept and reduce it to an object. He likes to take those objects and put them in his videos. Have em shake they jiggly bits, so they looks like hoes.