I-Vivi
VeniVidiVivi
I-Vivi

I am stunned that a white supremacist in black face was invited to an event discussing black issues. Seriously?!? Her very appearance on that stage makes her a winner, gives her credibility. So yes, we need to find out who invited her because anything else is besides the point. Whoever extended that invitation is not

She won. Her ideas and thoughts were dumb, but she increased her profile and that allows her Conservative grift to go on. This is the same person who won a discrimination lawsuit against her high school. She knows about discrimination and our history in this country.

Standing Ovation. I can literally see Sean Hannity’s head exploding if Barack did this. Oh wait I did see Fox News lose their fucking collective shit when Michelle Obama said “She was proud of her country” for giving her husband a chance to the democratic nominee. Really I would love to strap these assholes in a chair

She was invited for racial click-bating that they wanted and that’s exactly what they got.

I still be wondering what the right would be saying if some, say, black democratic presidential candidate, dared to use a campaign slogan that implied America wasnt great as it currently stood, let alone spent half his inauguration speech telling everyone all the problems with the country.

Nah, but a guy who does a Steelers podcast has given him the name of Mongrief.

He’s just jealous that the California Assembly successfully passed something.

Wasn’t it also mentioned several times during his brief NFL stint that coaches had asked him to fill a role other than QB, and he repeatedly refused to do so? Because “God wants me to be an NFL quarterback” or some such idiocy?

That shit is selfish!

The fact that this sanctimonious blowhard is on TV bitching about this is rich given that he carefully cultivated and monetized his college image while being a terrible failure at everything else he’s tried to do professionally.

Talk about selfish. The only reason the guy starting playing minor league baseball was because his name was becoming increasingly irrelevant after he was a huge bust in the NFL and he just SUCKS in Triple-A. If it was any other player playing like that in Triple-A, he wouldnt have a job anywhere. He literally only has

Not the Antonio Brown come back story I expected.

So rather than genuine personality conflict, it sounds like the dispute between Antonio Brown and Ben Roethlisberger was more of a “Tastes Great / Less Filling” type of problem.

Yeah, man. The lucrative field that gold diggers have been utilizing for years: being raped. 

I believe the saying is:

Yeah, that and his other shitty views are for sure why they picked him to appear. She didn’t even bother to prepare a counter argument because she was so sure he’d be on their side of this too.

She explains in the article why where they play matters, and nothing in that argument hinges on whether players get paid or do not get paid. The argument she is making is entirely separate from whether players should or should not get paid. 

Whether college athletes get paid won't change the fact that schools profit off athletes' labor

Yeah this is correct. They’re mutually exclusive issues. They can get paid and generate millions, just like professional athletes.

Weird criticism of her article. Student athletes aren’t being paid anytime soon, and in any event college athletes being paid is a topic that has been written about as nauseum. And the thrust of her argument doesn’t change regardless of whether college athletes are paid. It’s not like she’s arguing against them

That should have been Watson's first words, Why am I on here? You said athletes should shut up amd dribble ?