HughDarrow83
HughDarrow83
HughDarrow83

Actually, in all fairness, as a well-funded international movie with desire for mainstream success, Pacific Rim is unique for having a mech plotline. Yes, we all know mechs existed before Pacific Rim, particularly in other mediums.

That randomization of the chapters sounds like a brilliant way to avoid my biggest problem with the choice system in Walking Dead. Namely, knowing I had done a ton to support a certain character and yet having all the rapport that one would expect to have built up as a result disappear because I made one particular

This here's bat country (seriously, should have done a zubat one)

Yeah, I actually think that is precisely why they should consider lowering the drinking age here in the U.S. to 18 (and yes internet I know that technically it is up to the states but then high way funding). I'm hoping it would help weaken the insanely fracked up culture here on college campuses.

Looks like we are going to have to break into Neillysium. Get it? Amrite? Eh?

You can probably tell from my handle, but I really loved this game.

True, how fitting though that Shakespeare is hopelessly lost amid:
"My dick + your mouth=fun...motherfucker -For Daniel"

I need a vacation.

What a beautiful expression of humanity! Full of such encouragement for our fellow man.
"Daniel- You're Fuckin Pussy"
"Get Fucked Nerd"
"Daniel you Little Bitch!"
"Fuck Zimmerman"
And of course plenty of dicks.

I was going to start studying for the GRE today, but nah! Screw grad school!

I've actually never heard that one. Hah

Bryan Cranston once entered a Bryan Cranston look-alike contest and got third. :P

And that's true. I just posted the review because it did include the depiction of women as something that negatively factored into their review. Honestly, the review doesn't just focus on this though and also reviews the gameplay (noting its repetition as you mentioned) I do have to disagree though in that I don't

I agree that it is a debate worth having. I personally just think that it is also legitimate for people to judge her review of the game in much the same way that she judged the game: realizing the sociological implications and factors that went into it.

If someone already knows they do not agree with the idea that the

That first guy reminds me of my suitemate that I had in high school when I did summer governor's school.

He had no idea how much I was turned on by him. I apologize for this completely off topic post reminiscing about the good ole' days. I have nothing further to add.

I wouldn't really call it a "glowing" appraisal: "Dragon's Crown is a wild place to visit, but it doesn't quite hold up in the light of day"

Either way though, I actually don't have any problem with the reviewer taking points off for what she perceives as "gross" depictions of women (quotes are there because that is

Fast-paced society, check
School shootings, check
Earbuds that everyone uses, (Ipod) check
Parlour video screens that suck peoples' time, (videogames) check
Drone usage by police/security forces, check
Reality TV, check
Perhaps most scary of all, seeing the usage of primary sources as something more reserved for cranks,