You're choosing to impose a limit on scientific method by using the term "supernatural"

I agree that semantics often causes confusion.

I like spiders. They're generally peaceful, keeping to themselves and just want to get along.

I hear you...but I find the movie theater insufferable, at least here in the US, with talkers and texters.

Lack of testable evidence of something for which evidence has actively been sought, is generally indicative of it's lack of existence. Generally.

1. There is clear evidence, supported by science, that at the quantum level matter can indeed appear from "nothing". Clearly, you not being a scientist, you wouldn't understand how that could happen but you can easily find references on the web.

I'm not arrogant at all, nor do I label myself as an atheist. However you on the other hand are being irrationally insulting.

Good point.

Arthur C. Clarke

Of course this is hardly any more ridiculous than believing in a supernatural thing called a "god" in the first place.

What's that about fake Imax?

I'm just about to put in an order for a new 65 inch plasma, speakers, receiver, blu ray player.

err....ok

Man...that's priceless...

Man has a point...

And although not really considered porn..

Those points came up before.

"write the stories they've always wanted to and perhaps couldn't because there was no venue for them."

Thanks for your view...it's helpful.

Convenience as opposed to easily conveyable scientific accuracy? Right...