It's an either or, people. You're either with socky dicks or you're with cancer. Pick a side.

Yes, we actually did choose to use 9/11 imagery in part because we thought it would make people read the article.

Wikipedia: Gaze is as good a place to start as any.

Gotta punish WSU for winning

Deadspin commenters, like yourself, are truly pathetic.

I remember my first beer

In that Villanova-Villanova matchup, I think I like Villanova. Because there are some serious questions about Villanova, and I think Villanova can exploit that.

Read some MRA stuff. Whiniest, bitchiest shit on the internet.

My point is that it's an intentionally fake category. They mean "feminists, full stop," but they don't want to be associated with having listed "feminists, full stop" as an annoying group. So they say "Twitter Feminists," knowing that the voters have no actual familiarity with that group, and so they will just vote…

So it's just an "ugh feminazis amirite" outlet.

I think Twitter feminists is a weird category to be included. How many voters here follow even one feminist on Twitter? Is it just a convenient "ugh feminazis amirite?!" outlet for broing down?

if it stops gawker from changing the kinja layout again, i'm all for it.

TL;DR it now only costs $200 and an ebay listing to steal someone's identity.

This is real however.

That's a huge issue in the fake-car jumping community.

So now we live in a world where it's OK to be an asshole because if your douchebaggery is a problem for someone, they're just being overly sensitive?

He's a pompous, disrespectful blowhard who countenances spying and bullies guests. She a racist shit-stirrer who thinks she's advancing feminism by trolling and throwing other women she doesn't like under the bus, and then asking for dudebro points for being so "edgy" and "an equal opportunity offender". So I come…

Goodness gracious. In looking at the things I wrote, I don't think I exhibited any panic or overly dramatic reactions. I had a nice mini exchange with the person who wrote the article, in fact. Don't tell me to "calm the fuck down." You're more outraged at my post than I was in the first place. It was simply an…

This is all very....different, I suppose. But not funny. And more than anything, resembles a man in the throes of a mental disorder. I don't see how it's beneficial to anyone, anywhere, to stand and point at a human being that is clearly so damaged. Up the empathy.

I love all the bitching and griping below about how this is a "biased" article, yet no one seems to be able to point to anything that's incorrect. Standard internet grump "Wah wah I have to mock!"