“I’m pretty sure this is part of the venice biennale- I’m no performance art fan in general but this is actually a pretty smart piece BECAUSE the world is on fire and the emails are completely dull.”

I’m a little bit confused not only by the described event, but also by the tone of the article. I’m usually pretty good at recognizing the satire articles but I’m not sure I’m seeing it here.

I like Joan, but this was an unnecessary way to cover this. 

Hard agree. I like Joan, but this article is a very bad and dumb take.

Hillary Clinton’s sense of humor is amazing and legendary. Of course she brings up her emails, and your positing that the world has moved on from them is simply incorrect. Trump, Fox and co still bring them up all the time. And if you think we’re all going to refrain from “but her emails...” comments for every moment…

Weird take, from the casual insinuation that her emails were anything but a nothingburger, to the strange tone that seems to insist as though Hillary owes it to all of us to fix the world. Dunno what you were going for with this, but it seems like you’re just griping about Clinton as an extant person.

Glad to know we are still taking the time out of our days to criticize Hillary Clinton

WTF is this article?

Let a retired bitch be petty, Joan

Don’t worry. You don’t have to watch a lick of football to watch the intermission spectacle. And make no bones about it: JLo WILL be performing. The Oscars come on the heels of the SP and the JLo campaign will be full throttle by then.

My favourite Renee Zellweger story is two people doing the exact same thing in a restaurant about her appearance and dress sense and so on except in German. It was even worse because they knew she was there.

So, it’s ok to talk about Sharon Osborne’s face, but not Renee Zellweger’s?

It would be hilarious, though. Can you imagine Jen stoned out of her mind, giggling madly, and prank calling the National Enquirer while Courtney Cox is in the kitchen making cheese puffs from scratch.... just this one last time! :)

Except for one thing. I have nothing against it. It’s a good strategy.

Yes, a person who is not on social media and disappears for months at a time, is totally at fault for the fact that she is still famous, says the person who clicked on the article about her...which is obviously Jennifer Aniston’s fault, not yours. 

No, not really. Wait are you saying that she is anatomically a man?

Yes / No answer needed.  Does she have a penis?

Doesn’t it seem a little problematic that a woman whose testosterone falls within the allowed range isn’t allowed to compete?

She’s a woman. Whatever slight advantage she may have is natural. It’s not different than Micheal Phelps freakishly long arms and 130% natural lung capacity that may or may not be related to Marfan Syndrome. You will never be able to convince me that this targeted attack on her isn’t racially motivated because…

The majority of the trolls who want to make some sort of discriminatory comment have never ran half a mile in their entire lives.