Exactly my confusion as well. What a waste of time.

Tell me, how Dockery was supposed to tell that the car was stolen in the first place, and exactly what "due diligence" he was supposed to do before purchasing the car. I'm actually curious - CarFax or something? If he successfully registered it and Neely had reported the car as stolen, then the DMV should have thrown…

Am I the only one that doesn't like the sound of this thing? I know it's not, but it sounds like it's being lugged like crazy. There's no resonance at all, and it seems to be a very one-dimensional sound.

Thank you! I couldn't find the link with keywords Plymouth and Corvette.

Thank you.

There are idiots in this world.

Me too! I think it's pretty freakin' cool.

I agree on your point about the low-volume production. What makes this super-rare car so different from Gumpert and other "artisan" carmakers?

It's really cool and looks very un-Lambo. To me.

Hilarious. Thanks for posting this. Not being sarcastic.

I think the Buggy is absolutely fantastic! And 100hp in those things is kind of a lot! I'm all for this Buggy. Very nice design, very inviting, and so simple! Definitely VW-like but unlike anything they have right now. I would drive one.

I laughed. Don't you cry now.

Seriously . . yeah it's all swoopy and what-not, but this whole "YOU" thing is straight-up weird and moreover, this car doesn't look like a Volvo! I'm pretty disappointed by this concept. Hope this isn't what the future looks like.

True, but I'd rather be driving a Lotus 7 than a GTR, handling-wise (extreme examples of course).

Yes.

I'm almost completely with you, but I'd care about weight, and then change the sound later with exhaust if needed. It's a boxer - it'll sound nice. Or maybe you've got weight lumped with handling.

I don't want this app barfing all over my wall! Crap.

Headlights.

I don't love the guy on TV but it was really cool to see him suit up and drive this thing through the paddock and race it. He drove well in his race!

Must . . . change . . . pants . . . so . . . beautiful . . .