Hoaks2
Hoaks2
Hoaks2

Ah. The Glenn Beck type of Sarcasm. Very nice.

I agree completely. After I finished it, I didn't regret buying it (32 bucks at Gamefly), but I found it frustrating. The failure of the controls didn't really bug me until the end, when the "difficulty" goes up. That's when it got frustrating.

I'd give the whole series a go, if I were you. Won't take very long, and it's refreshingly not-serious. That's what I really like about Deadpool. They just constantly make fun of how serious and absurd other comics are. Like the recurring joke of "she's dead, remember? Oh yeah. I'll check back later." But there are

True. But it explains what's best about Deadpool: the craziness with underlying severe psychological damage and his drive to do the right thing, even though it never works out for him. There are times though, when the stories get terribly off track and get super boring. Even though it was short, I was a huge fan of

I really enjoyed Cable & Deadpool too, and I highly recommend it.

I straight up laughed at "whats the sound of one robot hand clapping?" "Dubstep?" and the seemingly non-sequitur "I wonder if that bouncy castle is still inflated?" I didn't laugh at that until I remembered it much later. Ha! That's classic Deadpool humor.

But we had 15 million hits on the day it was announced! "1 million and one... 1 million and 2..."

I think the big lesson here is that universities need to PLAY ALONG with the NCAA. Try to stonewall them like USC or just cover it up like tOSU, they get pissy. That phrase "lack of institutional control" bugs the hell out of me. It's their catchall for whatever they want to punish you for but don't have in the rules.

Well, that's not quite fair. The NCAA has already agreed that any advantage gained was un-intentional. And as for LaMichael James, Oregon didn't need influence to get him, nobody else wanted him. They did however get Lache Seastrunk out of the scandal, but he never played a down and now plays for Baylor. All in all,

Man, tennis is just crazy this year. Just.... wow.

Called a joke guy. Chill out. But if you want to be taken seriously, you may want to slow down on the baseless assumptions champ.

Wow man, calm down. Take a step back from that ledge. Maybe take a Prozac. It'll be alright. It is kind of indicative though that you kind of lump yourself in with the "cool kids" in the previous analogy.

"Look at me! I'm so cool because I have an opinion counter to most people on this site!"

Yeah, I call shenanigans on some of these. On California alone, how is it not McDonalds? This list is for popularity, right? Are you telling me that, worldwide, more people know about Apple than McDonalds? Because I'm going to disagree. Their sign says billions and billions served dammit! My whole world will come

Sorry, Intel is from Mountain View, CA and Adidas is from Germany. They do have a large presence here, but aren't from here. I'd say Columbia Clothing is up there, but not huge. But let's not forget about Tilamook Creamery! Or Dutch Bros. which is pretty big in the West Coast. Or how about Dakine? Pretty well known in

Love it! I'd also include possibly Gerber knives for Oregon. Washington definitely get's Starbucks though. They practically brag about it being their home, whereas Microsoft and Boeing just reside there (although by pure size, Boeing saturates the entire state of Washington). Starbucks saturates pretty much everywhere

Thanks! Great price, and the review made me want to buy it. So I did! Love me some Deadpool!

Well that was a letdown. After the French Open, I was really looking forward to a Wimbledon that included Rafa. Oh well. Good on Darcis though, he played very well. Now I guess we get to see how Federer recovers from his French Open performance, which is only slightly less interesting than Nadal.

Good write-up. Also, is it just me or do the Spurs get away with a lot of traveling? I know the NBA rarely calls it anymore anyway, but in each of these reviews by Donaghy, there is a "[Spur] shuffled/took too many steps, should have been called for a travel." I wonder if that's reactionary (they never call it, so

This whole thing is absurd. Basically, somebody interjected an insult in his words by assuming his lack of inclusion was intentional. I agree with him: he's right that men have penises and women have vaginas. There are exceptions to that rule but, by and large, it's correct. When something is factually true around 98%