No it didn't. Not entirely. It's not like people work on a timescale of decades. Things happen when they happen, crossing decades if need be. Nobody says "Oh shit! better stop what we are doing, it's the 90's now! Stop all that progress!" Also, seeing all the trouble you've been making on the boards today, somebody…

But I don't think it's necessary to get rid of Bakura and Thrawn. They are probably going to go pretty far down the timeline, with an old Leia and Han at least (Hamill hasn't said anything yet), so there is no reason that Thrawn couldn't have happened. Maybe make Mara have a cameo, sitting next to Luke at some point?…

This. This exactly. I couldn't agree more. Keep everything Zahn, burn the rest and I'm happy. Some of it goes too far anyway. At least Zahn only created a few (awesome) characters that are pretty much universally liked.

With the exception of pretty much everything written by Zahn, I agree. Oh, and Shadows of the Empire. Those are legit novels, and the Thrawn trilogy should be animated movies. If they sweep away everything but those, I'll be alright with it.

Boy, it just got really stuffy in here, don't you think?

Yeah, I had that section relatively down, but it took FOREVER! Could they send more patriots? Chain spark and handcannon. It was, however, boring, and totally out of place for the rest of the game.

Well, this plays in to my theory. Since there are 2 extra movies they plan on making that aren't related to the trilogy (the remnants of the live action show that wasn't), I fully expected one of them to be about Boba Fett. Seems like the obvious moneymaker to me. Now I'm betting they want a tie-in game, and wanted to…

You know, I was wondering about the violence as I played this. There are some areas where it really did shock me, like the melee. However, there are areas like the tied up and executed guards that really showed the hypocrisy and brutality of this seemingly perfect place, and I thought it was really poignant. What…

Yeah, sorry man. I have to come to Ainge's defense. He's a prick, but he's from Eugene, so I have to. Pat Riley has literally NO ground to stand on. Whined on every team but the Lakers, and acts like he's hot shit when he got most of his championships on the backs of Magic and Kareem. Fuck, I could coach Magic and…

Especially because he turned it around. If this were Latrell Sprewell, I probably wouldn't feel as bad. This guy just seemed unlucky; but at least he tried. Good on Larry Bird, Kevin McHale, and James Dolan.

It's right there. In section 3. Italicized. And it was more of an ensemble gig anyway, even though Carrell was the main character. He was in no way what made that movie funny.

I said nothing about mocking. But your comment was "throwaway," as you put it. This is what I'm referring to. You're original comment was slightly over-reacting for comedy purposes, was it not? If it was, it was a joke related to the article. If it wasn't, then it was a feminist tangent only slightly related to the…

Gods and Kings has some awesome stuff to it. So far, my favorite new civ is Austria. You can pay to convert City-States to you! And it's not even very expensive. Great way to expand rapidly to new continents.

Awesome! I'm excited about them making Cultural Victory a deeper experience, because it's my go-to victory. However, from the way I'm understanding "influence," that's totally gonna wreck my strategy of expanding early, putting up solid borders, and fostering culture like mad in the interior.

Bravo, good sir. That is indeed a legitimate question. More like 75% though.

You sure you weren't thinking of here?

I agree that he overreacted, but I also kind of agree that this whole "stereotypical angry feminist" gag is, like everything else on Gawker blogs, getting old. That horse has been beat in to the GROUND!

Don't listen to those fools. The whole "splitting hairs" thing is the base of the whole "what is pirating" argument. Just throwing them all under "Downloading is piracy" pile is a strawman argument. Not choosing to delve in to the details is willfully ignoring the argument to ride a moral high-horse.