Good thing it's not white-on-black, though, amirite? :/

More like:

I'm not sure Dark Souls is a fair comparison. One game is meant for a wide audience, including children (perhaps especially), another is meant to piss you off to no end by killing you repeatedly.

What is this 'bloom' everyone is talking about? Flowers? Flowers everywhere?! :O

How is lumping every man into a "potential raper" group any better than having someone lock their car doors as a black person walks generally toward their car? You can throw statistics out there and "prove" a particular group of people are more prone to doing terrible things, but does that make the generalization…

In the first arc private vs. public comes into play, mirroring some of the ongoing health care debate. Only in our book and the world of dangerous physics, people opt out of FBP coverage and go private.

6:27 in the video. Now I know why they cut off the top of the face. D:

Thank you for the well thought out response. It begins to make sense to me, at least in part.

So far, things have shown that gender dysphoria has a grounding in how the person is wired, so to speak, while thinking you're an entirely different species is a result of severe psychosis- the brain malfunctioning, so to speak, whereas gender dysphoria is the brain working perfectly fine but not of the appropriate…

The Peace of the Lord be with you...

I was going to post something similar until I saw your own. Yeah, it does seem weird that there's only 1 $500 backer, yet the average donation for each donor should be ~$560? Wat?

I think 95% of the world disagrees with that word "most." O.o

I'm glad to see that you were having the same BDSM issues with the 12-14 archer gear. Jesus. The more I put on, the less I was actually wearing. What kind of archer wears a gladiator thunder-wrap for their junk?

They should be able to gauge possible server load they'd need for Early Access from the # of preorders bought, especially considering each preorder coming with guaranteed Early Access. The fact that the servers were in this much access with this much load restriction tells me that they didn't do that.

There's a difference between what the code allows and what the developer intended. In some circles, namely MMO's, such exploits of coding bugs are viewed as cheating and can be bannable offences (WoW/Blizzard being a notable example). If the only argument is because "the game let them do it," the moderators don't…

I saw where you took that anology, and, for most of the argument, made sense with it. (I personally take the more libertarian view of 'marriage' and leave it up to the individuals rather than the state to define it.)

Spelling typos aside, you would think that the game developers did not intend their players to jump through walls and skip 80-90% of the content they designed and implemented. This is an exploit, and, to many, is considered cheating.

I think my point was more geared toward the idea that, while it may be an accepted playstyle within their select circles where such authority holds weight, not everyone views it as an acceptable playstyle or even a legitimate authority. It's a differing of opinions. It doesn't make one more right or more wrong than…

Was it intended by the developers? No? What other definition is there? Would you prefer the term "eploit"? That's not much better.

Defined by what authority? Does this authority have legitimacy over people's opinions and set standards?