HeatherL
HeatherL
HeatherL

Oh, it was there, but like all terrible shit, it was just in hiding. The early 2000's saw a lot of drug trade online, easier sharing of illegal images, etc. But back then the bad stuff was truly criminal, it wasn't just people hiding behind the computer using it to abuse others then go on and live normal lives. I

Woah woah woah, where the hell did I equate those as being the same(the fact that you jumped to that makes me a bit sick honestly)? The point is that he says he doesn't know enough or understand enough about gay relationships to fully write them. But he still writes about far more lewd topics, and with his line of

I never claimed this was a good critique, but critique, no matter how ludicrous, can be helpful. It stirs up conversation around a subject, which is important.

As a professional artist, I really disagree. I've seen to many people in too many forms of art use "if you don't like it don't look at it" as a cop out for offensive material or insensitive treatment of subject matter.

No one's demanding he write gay characters. No one's demanding anything. It's critique, it's an important part of any artform. When this is a writer who had no issues depicting violent rape and sex scenes with minors, but says he can't write gay sex scenes....of course eyebrows will be raised. People are allowed to

Good point.

People have fallen off cliffs taking regular pictures. "Selfie" is just a buzzword for people to feel superior because they don't take pictures of themselves. I'd say it's pretty disrespectful to use that as clickbait.

True, that clothing can be a product of societal pressures, but I will always have a problem with those that target and shame people just for wearing the clothes that make them feel more comfortable/make them blend into society. I think we need to have a discussion more centered on the bad of the fashion industry, and

But it's not like it's offensive.

I'm not Inuit myself, but I grew up around many reservations/communities in northern canada, so while I can't speak about what's offensive or not....it's easy to see these people know nothing about the culture.

Why the fuck does it matter what pieces of clothing someone wears? Articles like this are just mean spirited.

This entire article made me quadruple face palm.

I agree. I've seen way too much police brutality already, I cannot believe people are still hesitant to lay blame on police. It's appalling.

I've had so many games in stalemates that basically ends up being us sitting around defending our base from minions and not being able to team fight because we either have afks or ragers. Those ragers are usually the ones who are denying a surrender, even though it's clearly unwinnable.

Eh, being in bronze isn't always a personal problem. Bronze can have tons of AFKers and ragers that throw you out of promo range in a matter of 4 or 5 games. I crawled up ranked by playing with a partner who was always 1 or 2 leagues ahead of me, we usually got matched with people above my bracket, and I could still

But not surrendering can be very toxic too. It wastes people's time. We have no evidence to suggest that OP would rage in chat. It's not toxic to admit your team did poorly, and to move on. It's better to realize a game in going nowhere and then get a fresh start on another match.

Extroverted is not shorthand for asshole.

As someone who works in 3d modelling for film...you can cut so many corners with rigging(actually most of the animations for aveline were reused from male motion cap). There's not a real stark difference between male and female run and attack cycles, dark souls highlights that point. I can pump out a character model

I was talking about the recent AC that's coming under fire, not past ones.

Ah the, "I'm not sexist I treat everything the same!" argument. It's idealist to say the least. It ignores the more complex issues in how female led games are funded, marketed and treated. It ignores the lack of an even playing field.