Well, ‘cause getting the suction cup mount for a Garmin to stick to that curved canopy is really tough.

Historically not in most crew positions, but most of our new blast-resistant seats do have belts now. Not that you can get soldiers to use them ...

Looks like it will buff right out.

Yep — I’d love one, but compared to my ‘06 S2000 (in the same, best color Laguna Blue Pearl), it would be a step back in performance. I don’t need a 500-hp stump-puller, but 260-300 hp in the BRZ might make me a buyer.

Yep. Beware the military-industrial-Congressional complex.

Given the current requirements leveraged on the Geographic Combatant Commands by the National Command Authority (via the National Security Strategy, National Defense Strategy, and all of the real-world goings-on) a strong argument can be made that none of the services are large enough or well-resourced enough to meet…

Though the services are certainly at fault in procurement problems when it comes to setting requirements (though those requirements, in theory, are to meet the missions the military has been given), it’s important to note that that’s still under civilian control:

Not a military question — that’s a civilian question. The military isn’t “trying” to do anything except execute the tasks its civilian leaders have assigned it.

Orlove: Go read Clausewitz, then get back to us.

YF-23. The better of the two Advanced Tactical Aircraft prototypes.

Honda Fit. In manual form it’s a blast; rev-happy and tossable. I’ve tracked & auto-crossed mine.

Don’t we wish. Except for Tesla, there are no company dealers in the US — they are all independent dealerships resulting from archaic distribution systems dating to the 1940s (or earlier).

For Sale: ImpStarDeuce. Ran when parked.

Tuneband is great. I use the rubber portion as a case full time. Durable, easy, and effective.

Tuneband is great. I use the rubber portion as a case full time. Durable, easy, and effective.

Needs the Spy Hunter theme playing in the background.

They haven't but that's a pretty good idea, actually. External fuel tanks work pretty well and there is room on the rear sponsons aft, as long as the tanks are designed to not interfere with mobility.

Yep, the fuel economy sucks but replacing the engine has been found to be far more costly than any of the other things that have been doe to the take, for far less return; the near-term solution is to finally field an under-armor APU to drastically reduce the tank's fuel requirement while halted. If someone were to…

Not any time soon. The cost of an engine replacement has repeatedly been ruled out as too expensive for the relatively modest gains in fuel efficiency.

M1A2SEPv3 is the current official plan for the "Abrams ECP 1" effort. The Abrams program has a bit of an allergy to a new alpha designation because there's a perception that that equals a "new program" for which increased oversight and scrutiny would be required.

Tank commander visibility is the concern — as you can see it impedes forward visibility when the tank commander is operating out of the hatch.