No, they're straight up attacking men who want to help them. How is that not clear? I'm on your side, do not attack me, I am not the enemy.
No, they're straight up attacking men who want to help them. How is that not clear? I'm on your side, do not attack me, I am not the enemy.
When the article is basically "Hey, white men suck!" the conversation is most definitely about me. The author straight up called out the entire demographic. And has on multiple occasions, and continues to do so. Today's top article is about men not admitting to being adults.
I can understand your point a bit, but I have to take a stand against it. The stereotype you illustrate against yourself should be something we denounce at every turn. You should not be referred to as a blight on this country (in all honesty single mothers are probably the foundation of the country if you look back…
Those are the MRAs. We don't want to be MRAs. We hate MRAs as much if not more than you guys. There is a camp of men who DON'T think it's all the fault of women and minorities. Sincerely do not. We know it's the system that sucks.
YES. There are men out there who listen! We want to help! We help as much as we can! We raise our daughters to believe they can do anything, our sons not to take the women in their lives for granted and to treat them as equals. We read news sites such as Jezebel because we are interested in making society a better…
If the lesson is "If your voice is even heard, then you dominate the conversation because of your skin color and gender" then I guess so
Per my mother "Never pass a penny"
It should only focus on the preapproved interests of the group, which have determined your voice has no value Lite
White men definitely benefit in many ways. No one is disputing that. The concern is that there are ways that white men don't benefit.
I also know Frankiepoops personally, and have no idea what he is talking about here
As a curious guy, can you provide some sensible reading on the whole patriarchy and custody rights issue? I'm trying to read up on it (not to say I don't trust you, I'm just the curious type) but the only thing I can find are either MRAs spewing hate. That, or blogs talking about how much they hate MRAs and how wrong…
Oh Tech Hipsters, your superiority complex is so cute!
While we appreciate your obvious superiority, especially since your knowledge is so vast, your tone has made the patron saint of Geek Learning, Bill Nye, perplexed
We do, but because of gender stereotypes the way we handle emotions is muted. Thus, if there is a conflict between two friends, the emotional responses are not focused upon because to do so would be "gay" and frowned upon. It's not mature or really healthy, but it's true
#2 is wrong, because you need to rub it in his face when his team gets destroyed
Honestly, I always find the other characters around Superman the interesting ones in the story. Stories about how people react to a living breathing god essentially. Red Son was great for the supporting cast, Lex and Lois especially. But Supes never speaks to me, even in the hands of Mark Waid
It's optional since you don't HAVE to play those games. I choose not to own an X-Box because playing Halo is optional.
Honestly, you guys win. I'm not sure your arguments are perfect, but you're TRYING. It's an intellectual and open conversation, without yelling or eye rolling. We need more of this. Sincerely, thank you for restoring a little bit more faith in the Gawker community
Woah, woah, I love my wonderful intangibles! Don't you dare threaten to trade them
Ah, see, there goes my confusion. Thanks for clearing that up