old people, amiright?

My favorite part of the lead in is "The net was not tight enough to stop the ball"

sure, in the same way that when someone tells me "I'm gonna rape you, faggot" is a personal threat. in that it isn't at all, its' trolling which she properly reported him for.

counterpoint, Maybe you don't have the reading comprehension to understand what we're talking about. I called her expectation that she would be personally updated and involved in the enforcement process entitled, not reporting this waste of life. I'm happy he got banned.

gee, thanks, glad you cleared up telling someone you want to rape them is against the TOS. welcome to the thread!

It's against the TOS....your not allowed to inquire into the enforcement action between MS and the account your reporting, and your never told the outcome. that process is between MS and the violator. It's in the automated message she's made she received as well.

Right, this is my point. Not that the kid who did this isn't a complete asshole, or that he didn't earn that ban.

reading ftw. I stated her contention that she should receive personal updates on the status of the enforcement is entitled, not reporting this kid for being a fucktard. She absolutely should have done that, and I'm happy he got banned.

no, i'm confused as to why she thinks she has right to be personally involved in that process and receive personal updates on it. She absolutely should have been offended and reported the asshole, which she did. I think expecting a ban might have been a bit much, but I'm happy he ended up banned. one less troll for…

I'm confused as to why she expected a ban for a nasty message and to be personally updated on that process.

Still waiting on your list.

it (media integration) is being pushed as a Core feature by Microsoft. therefore, it is OK to evaluate it as a core feature, and comment on it's value to me, the potential consumer.

No, there is something better, someone who has clearly put blinders on to any negative feedback on a product because they've convinced themselves that it can do no wrong.

But it's being pitched as a main selling point of the console, consistently, by Microsoft. If "changes the whole way you watch media!" ect.

so because I don't have to buy it as it is currently being pitched to me, I'm not allowed to question the value of any feature being used as a selling point?

No, I am questioning the value of the feature to me as a consumer. That's valid, because Microsoft, I would assume, would like me to follow up my 360 purchase with a Xbox One.

or alternatively, I could not buy it, which is what I'm leaning towards based on what has currently been announced.

no, but generally if I was watching live TV and decided to play a game instead, and suddenly become interested in the live TV i was watching moments previously, what channel do you suppose is on the cable feed?

Mabey this is the diconnect between me and the Xbox One.

If I wanted to I can do all that shit now. It's called the input button on my remote.