You might be the only one who doesn’t notice that the problem isn’t the sale, but that Trump’s administration greenlit it a week after getting down on Qatar hard as a sponsor of terrorism.

1. So this will do dick-all for reducing expenditures and the deficit, it will just move that spending to the states. It will also make the differences in life expectancy between states much worse. Great. I hope you don’t live in a red state.

Or that the rest of the market won’t take advantage of some of the competitors having a sudden 35% price increase.

Damn, these all-female remakes are getting silly. Ghostbusters was ok, but this? Spiceweasel is still in teathers...

One option if you REALLY need the full hug is simple: stand one step backwards from where you would usually stand for a hug and lean in as he approaches, and pat his back rather than squeeze. It’s very awkward to keep that up. Bonus, pelvises don’t touch.

So.... Imma guess Toronto, Montreal and Mexico City Airports will be having a nice uptick in passengers?

Keeping electronics in the cargo hold makes it harder for the DHS to fall into the realization that all their security’s a stage, and all the agents and officers are players.

It’s a valid concern.

You’re absolutely right, this a site about life hacks.

Politics is full of hacks nowadays.

Doesn’t mean it should be taken down.

Good answer. I should have specified the reserve too. But you do get the point, right?

No, child. You just have no understanding of any of this, and bitch because others get to have a different candy than you do.

Taxes are confiscation in the same way the bank confiscates my money to pay for interest. Under modern law, it is not considered confiscation. If you want to use it in such a way, be prepared to be misunderstood.

Tell me ONE transaction between two private entities (that is, non-governmental) that does not in any way come from already taxed money.

Uh, you can deduct your PC if you use it for work. So with your internet, printer and the like.

It’s not vapid. You’re just not getting it.

Ah, you’re an abject moron.

I don’t like that argument, however. People don’t save in stocks because it’s a tax haven. People invest in stocks because it’s the best way to grow your money passively. If you tax stuff the same, people will still invest in stocks. There’s little need to subsidize it generally.

Ah, you’re just deeply ignorant of the topic.