God help me, I’m on antibiotics, so no booze for me.

Hookers and crack also go back to the economy, btw.

Uh, no. What a silly comment.

There is just so much wrong here.

That’s the definition of uninformed moron.

Not only them, bit basically everyone knowing anything about radio. That’s pretty much all major media companies and universities. Worldwide.

Bingo.

It’s one of the quainter quirks of our electoral system.

Blood libel.

Did you see the primary?

Clinton also advocates easing student loan debt. Her plan isn’t perfect, but it’s actually workable.

It’s the kinder option. They’re either being romantic or idiots.

Poor pubis. Honestly. Dude was the architect of the Growth and Opportunity Project, the document that was to be their 2016 strategy. Trump is the precise exact opposite of that.

Way I understand it, there has to be damage in principle for libel to stick, but it’s so easy to come up with damages that as you say, its only mitigating in practice.

There certainly are better defenses, but this one is great at its purpose, which is to slap an obvious attempt to intimidate the press rather than a good faith approach to resolve a problem. It’s sweeter because it does have a legal basis (even if, as you say, is very hard to uphold).

Internet diagnoses ain’t cool.

You’re not wrong, for what it’s worth.

Not exactly. Libel requires it to be false and damaging.

That is to be expected. There is more to know about his sexual assault history than about his policies.

It’s ok to have fantasies. Not decent but ok to crassly express them.