Libertarianism is very coherent.

Poor puppy, he really did win the discrimination lottery, didn’t he?

You just know he’d be intimidated by a toothpick

Shit, son, you’ve just described supply-side Jesus to a T.

Those two points are the two things he and Trump do see eye-to-eye on, it appears.

No, it was right.

One thing I really hated was the whole million bucks stolen subplot.

Those aren’t tips. They’re actual meaningful lifestyle changes, and who the hell wants that?

Along with his squinty look, hair and cheeto-dust tan, I’m certain of something:

This is especially interesting a question because the political operative is trying to accuse the other side of using the charity she’s defending of making it political.

Ok, it’s very simple:

Sadly for them, Trump is doing his best to make sure everyone speaks the code fluently. His power base is essentially people who didn’t understand why dog whistles were necessary in the first place.

Robodildonics is the easiest field of robotics.

Now that’s entirely subjective, isn’t it?

The “I could do that” is my favorite argument. Yeah, you could, but you didn’t. The credit is for coming up with the idea, too.

It’s neither shady nor immoral. The basis for that is essentially, to be fair. Ignoring icanneverremember...’s great explanation, we can justify it seeing mundane situations:

Lactokinetic, please.

This will be an unsatisfactory answer, but it’s the only one we have:

Yes, it is art.

Well, by practically any standard definition, it’s art. In the attempting to make art, there’s art.