The Timberlake comment is so classic: There's nothing like being dumped for lack of commitment and unwillingness to settle down to make a man think he should commit to settling down. How do I know this? Marketing research tells me so: [www.amazon.com]

Agreed. But without the whole 500-year-old lack of concern for the unborn, the recently born, etc. The idea of children as fully realized humans (and not just small creatures with a low chance of actual survival, either in or out of the womb) is fairly recent, no? I mean, some cultures didn't even name kids until…

Maybe he received it four years ago?

edit for duplicate

Ah yes — I agree about the transoceanic flight thing. Then again, I find normal seating on those flights to be pretty much a nightmare regardless (I researched for days before choosing Korean Air last time I went to Asia, and the leg room was still bad). If only I could afford the upgrade! But even then, it seems…

Why do I think that the only reason Zsa Zsa's on life support forever is because that horror show, her husband, gets nothing in the will. I thought the same when he threatened to — what was it? — either adopt or genetically engineer a baby with her?

I have no problem sitting next to heavier customers and honestly couldn't care less if they take up part of my seat too. Have you ever sat on a subway? I've long since given up on the idea that I get "personal space" on any sort of mass transit, airplanes included. With that in mind, I can choose to be a decent human…

I suppose it's possible that the 15% were at a disadvantage, what with the pollsters not including a definition of "blind" as the lead-in to the question.

Also, not always a grueling decision. Sometimes it's just a relief to have that option.

Sometimes I worry that my Easter outfit is insufficiently formal or too short or too tight, etc. If this is what the royals are wearing, I'm guessing I'm doing just fine.

Forget what's-his-face! Guys like that are hardly new news. I'm interested in the cougar piece!