Godsavethekeen
Godsavethekeen
Godsavethekeen

Wait, is this the same movie where the hulk destroys a city and another one is destroyed by Ultron? The same Ultron that was created by Tony Stark in the first place?

The clockwork orange listened. It unfolded.

Uhm... could be, sure, why not? But there are 7 billion people in the world, even if only a small percentage will find severe tissue damage attractive, it's still more than zero. I mean, I hope.

I agree: there must be a magnificent, PORTENTOUS blend of ugliness that indeed transcends cultural associations, time and space… and time again. However, as you said (as I THINK you said): for us, the lesser uglies (who can only aspire to attain those levels of unsightliness), there will be SOMEONE who finds us

I don’t think ‘ugly’ is universal. There is great variation on what is deemed (un)attractive through time and across cultures. To name a few examples: being tan is deemed attractive, but it has been deemed ugly (or undesirable) in the past; body types considered beautiful in Roman times are not the body types that

There's this: "which are taking a dramatic toll on the ecosystem, notably the clam and soft-shell crab population."

Uhm... cats?

“If I thought there was some god who really did care two hoots about people, who watched ’em like a father and cared for ’em like a mother…well, you wouldn’t catch me sayin’ things like ‘there are two sides to every question’ and ‘we must respect other people’s beliefs.’ You wouldn’t find me just being gen’rally nice

You are not your fucking khakis.

Gah, once I got from work and I could hear the neighbour who lives in the flat at the end of the hall sort of moaning 'OH BILL! Biiiiiillllll!' (coincidentally, Bill was the name of the caretaker). I didn't think much of it, I was new in the building and didn't know my neighbours well... anyways, this went on for some

Cor blimey! That IS clever. Rearranging fantasies accordingly.

Now, if you imagine you bought it and that you are wearing it when you travel through time and space, you save on laundry detergent.

Fair enough.

I'd like to add that I mentioned translation in my previous post as a way to show that I indeed am inclined to agree that mental states are constituted solely by their functional role (since I have to deal with words following the same paradigm). I wasn't trying to discuss language or translation problems here, but

Oh boy, I'm not an AI skeptic (as far as I can tell); I thought the debate was valid, I consider your replies to be well thought out and articulate, and I and wanted to hear your opinions on a few matters, namely: the separation of form and function.

This is an interesting debate, when studying language, we are told that form and function are generally one and the same and not completely separate entities, the same function but with a different form would be a completely different thing overall. For instance, compare these two phrases:

"To further the interests of my respective nation I shall build this thing that melts the skin of individuals, and dissolves their lungs! But FIRST, I shall try in it these helpless animals, well-balanced individual that I am! BRING OUT THE PUPPIES! Today I'm filled with empathy!."