Gob_Hobblin
Gob_Hobblin
Gob_Hobblin

Maybe we could sucker those paramilitary guys into flyfishing: it’s just as addictive and only marginally more expensive.

I don’t know what ‘loss of personal identity’ you’re talking about with our ‘particular movement.’ The majority of the movement on the liberal side is about the empowerment of personal rights: it just so happens that those whose rights would be empowered (women, LGBTQ people, minorities) seems to irk others.

A lot of that argument (that they use) is that you have a right to freely travel, but you don’t have a right to a car. Which is...very gentle logic.

It’s not abuse, it’s a polyamorous rescue romance.

Trump...Trumpalooz...oids?

What concerns me is that, if they keep pushing hard enough, the left will respond in the manner that they want. We’ve had a few high profile shootings already from people who were on the hard left (Dallas is the one that sticks out to me), and anyone will become violent if they feel they’ve been squeezed into a

Well, there is, and it’s a terrible reason: it’s an accessory. They aren’t walking around with those weapons because they want something to defend themselves (they think they do). They’re doing it for the same reason someone wears a nice shirt, or expensive sunglasses, or a designer handbag. They are making a

But what’s ‘the Right?’ You saw the numbers Ossof pulled in Georgia, which means, clearly, people in the right-wing voted for him. You talk to the average right-wing voting citizen, they’re bewildered. Ignore the Trumpists that hop on to forums and post, or Facebook posts as well (I disavow anything anyone puts on

Remember, there are some people in the community (communities) of law enforcement and the military that are straight up nuts, but you get that everywhere. It does require a closer eye, though, for obvious reasons.

Yup-yup: you can not outdraw someone who is already drawn on you, and simply having the weapon exposed does not mean it’s drawn. If someone was to start something, all having an exposed weapon does is paint a bulls-eye on a person and escalate rapidly. With a weapon concealed, it’s possible to assess and develop a

I’m I could help. Don’t spend your time worrying about it, though. The best thing to do is educate and engage.

That is the difference, and that’s what I mean: we don’t need to take action against Milo. That is what he wants. We just...need to ignore him. Him and others of his ilk crave an audience, it’s how they act and how they influence us. It’s troll behavior. The easiest way to deal with a troll is to take away the

Anytime!

Jesus! He kept a loaded Glock in his glovebox!? And never took it out when he was at home?

Oh, Obara Huckabee:

Yes, and no: I agree that certain elements of the extreme (like Milo Yiannopolous) don’t really deserve air time, and that’s not a censor them issue. That’s an ignore them issue. They don’t deserve our free press. In that case, I think you’re right.

Oh, that won’t be an active shooter! That will be a random suburban golfing accident! You can’t...you can’t have active shooters with white people!

You’re too late, lumenatrix! You’ll never be as tacticool as THESE GUYS!

If it’s any consolation, I’m in West Texas: so far away from the Bay. And Napa....sweet, sweet Napa.....

Oh, you!