Click-grab 101: Use the word "Racist" in title. Even if you're saying it's NOT racist.
Click-grab 101: Use the word "Racist" in title. Even if you're saying it's NOT racist.
You are sadly mistaken. You might be happier with a different option, and that's fine, but the FireTV is worth every penny.
I have a Roku 3, and my parents just bought a FireTV and asked me to set it up. The FireTV is leaps and bounds better than the Roku! It is worth every penny unless you're happy with the cheaper Rokus, but definitely better than the 3 in every way.
Oh good, we can stop worrying about the blacks and start focussing our hate towards the Mexicans. Wonderful news.
FFS does it need to be spoon-fed to you fucking cretins? There's a good reason behind each of these fears:
Da fuq we do with all of the spent fuel rods? We barely know what to do with the relatively few (compared to if we moved to strictly nuclear power) we have now.
That's my run-on sentence-laden, poorly formatted paragraph, not just a line, thank you very much. But now you're drawing conclusions that weren't there. I never claimed my superior testicles had any bearing on my driving skills; I eluded that MMinSC's (are you MMinSC??) choice of unnecessarily large vehicle was due…
Nice use of pedantic, and good form trying to win an internet troll-argument with insults instead of supporting your position. Full credit from this post.
Accepting defeat? Thank you! #hastagsareforretards (does using the hashtag in this manner make me a hipster? crap)
I love yelling at cyclists. Thank you for that.
You failed reading comprehension in elementary school, didn't you? "Driver's" as in the World that is the Driver's - his or her own personal world not pertaining to the road per-se but for the fact that they happen to be traversing it at the moment in question. Also not plural-possessive as in many drivers owning…
You see, this is all coming from your perspective. I've usually found that with cyclists, it's always all about them. They can't fathom a scenario where there could possibly be anything more im-fucking-portant than them going on in the driver's world. Then, whenever one of their ranks gets mowed down, they all come…
There are just so many ways to play this, I can't pick one...on the one hand, you can't "learn to be intelligent", but on the other I could just go do a victory lap in the parking lot, hopefully mowing down a cyclist in the process, and post a vine...or I could play along and troll the shit out of you... Decisions…
I can see by your avatar that you are obviously impartial. Valid opinion, thanks.
Old crusty shit can be used for fuel, she has no such purpose. Although I can almost commend her for hitting a cyclist....I am having a moral dilemma here.
Sorry, I got here late
Because he's probably driven on a roadway with a cyclist, who was obviously in the right to be riding there, except the road was probably too narrow for two cars to pass safely going in opposite directions nevermind adding a fragile-ass cyclist to the mix, and instead of pulling the fuck out of the way at the first…
Honestly, cyclists are the worst, and if you've ever driven where they ride, you've considered running one down. Don't fucking deny it, hypocrite!
The only question left is: How does this "sea-gas" stack up to gasoline/fossil fuels in efficiency? Meaning, if I currently achieve 30mpg in my car with gasoline, and pay ~$3.50 a gallon, could I still get 30mpg from this fuel, all things being equal? I don't care if they can keep the cost "down" to $3-$4 a gallon…