GitEmSteveDave
GitEmSteveDave.com
GitEmSteveDave

Partly correct: Pilots in the United States who obtain a multi-engine rating in an aircraft with this push-pull, or "centerline thrust," configuration are restricted to flying centerline-thrust aircraft; pilots who obtain a multi-engine rating in conventional twin-engine aircraft do not have a similar limitation with

So how fast SHOULD it have fallen? Are you implying it fell faster than the gravitational constant? Does that mean that there were rocket boosters on the top? Or was it slower? You need to answer that question before people can go about explaining to you how you could be mistaken.

What about pull-push planes with 2 engines? They are exactly as controllable if you lose an engine.

I was trying to refute that it was a hobby, and saying that with single engines planes, it's harder to recover if that engine fails. It's also harder to get a multiple engine license, which means that the single engine planes are the most likely to crash, which is why we hear so much about them.

No, the resulting fire, fueled by both aviation fuel/whatever was in the offices and the massive updraft through the windows broken by the impact and the survivors, caused the steel to heat to the point where it was weakened to the point of being malleable. Given that the trade centers were built with the unique

Isn't everything melted/heated by fuel? Also, thousands of metal smithes would like to explain to you how wood can be used to melt metal and how they have been doing it for centuries.

You need to stop getting all your news from Alex Jones. It's funny that you will say there is no debris, but will then whip out the fact that debris was so widespread to "prove" there was a missile fired.

The big problem is that it is harder to get a multiple engine license than a single engine license. The easiest way to get a single engine license is to pilot a plane that utilizes two engines in a push-pull configuration. [en.wikipedia.org] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_Skymaster

Link to location via Google Maps:[g.co]

Crash victims identified via press release. 2 Adults, 3 children, and a dog. [www.nj.com]

I remember something like this: [www.scientificsonline.com] that was filled with the filings and mineral oil to prevent rust. I bet with a fine enough powder, you could duplicate this.

Lawsuits from when some kid drinks it.

Aren't they almost like LastPass? What I mean is that I install LastPass in my browser, it monitors my surfing, when it sees I enter a password, it asks if I want to save it. If I choose yes, it is saved on LastPass's server in an encrypted form, but they can not decode it unless I give them the password. But I

I have trouble believing/understanding why we would put a remote physical destruct on a device that is being used multiple times. The main reason being that if it has the ability to blow itself up, then every time it's somewhere, it has to be treated like a live bomb, and also it's no longer a drone, but a long range

Comparing an aerial bombardment campaign that failed to do what it was attempting to do to a country that has shown it will lie in order to look more powerful claiming something that is very difficult for even us to do, is a little off. I think the issue is that it isn't "just hacking". It would mean that they broke

How do we know it's undamaged? I bet if your crashed the side of your car into a wall, a group of sheet metal workers and painters could use the undamaged side as a template to hide the damage from anything but the closest of scrutiny in less than 24 hours.

Except they stopped doing that many years ago. Here is a question: If this is designed to use military GPS, is it so hard to imagine that if it loses that signal, it might not use the civilian signal as a backup? I know my car GPS can use two different GPS signals, regular GPS and one WAAS/EGNOS.