So 8 year olds who live with their same-sex parents aren’t willing to live by Mormons’ standards and are willfully violating church standards by being born and needing food and shelter? Essentially damning them to hell (or whatever) for existing is not a “punishment”? Nor is it an attempt to punish the parents who…

What was implied (perhaps unclearly) is that there are VERY loud complaints every single time about every single thing said by any single person or group. No matter what anyone says or does about/towards women - there’s someone on Jezebel trying to demonize whichever individual/group is up next in line.

-Change the question: I find “PEOPLE” who succed professionally are neglecting someone.

Googling now! Currently pregnant and switched from peppermint tea (which I heard can have negative effects) to chamomile bc CHAMOMILE. What can be wrong with chamomile!?

True. Because only a real bitch would be putting in all that time and energy trying to ensure that he gets life saving medical treatment and dealing with all the insurance bureaucracy to make sure that her fiance doesn’t have to while he is going through a terrible health crisis, AMIRITE??! She totally is just in it…

True. Because only a real bitch would be putting in all that time and energy trying to ensure that he gets life saving medical treatment and dealing with all the insurance bureaucracy to make sure that her fiance doesn’t have to while he is going through a terrible health crisis, AMIRITE??! She totally is just in it…

Because sometimes people have bad relationships with weddings or past trauma or issues they’re sorting out and aren’t done with yet.

By why doesn’t that go both ways? If a dude is willing to let go of an amazing relationship b/c he doesn’t want to buy a piece of jewelry and have a party, then he should find someone else too. If that is what marriage is REALLY reduced to, then that should tell you something either way. The men in your friends’ lives…

I kind of disagree here. (Full disclosure/background: Married for 5 years after being together for 7; we discussed getting married, but no “ultimatum”—both just waiting for a time we felt was right given our life circumstances).

The best part is that this whole thing apparently started because someone didn’t understand what “idiosyncratic” means. (Hint: not the same as idiotic.)

I want to know the origins of that stock photo. What was the anticipated purpose of that photo? Is it owned by the guy who jumped off the ship and did he do it just so that someone would have a reason to purchase this photo?

Right. Given the title of the episode and the fact that people viewed it and approved it — and given Matt Damon’s reaction to his viewing of the earlier conflict — I would not be surprised if they thought they were showing these clips to demonstrate how open they are and how “difficult” Effie is. Very “LOL, She’s so…

But do you remember how many times someone’s phone rang? We don’t ban phones at conferences (or anywhere else except the occasional courtroom), we assume that people will have the courtesy to put it on vibrate/turn it off/go outside. Inevitably that does not happen 100% and pretty much everything I have ever been to…

So its still 1) not “being nice” its trying to get something and 2)its still their overwhelming desire to get whatever it is they think they can get that is overriding their knowledge that it is rude.

That's the worst! You can never actually say "I'm not interested" b/c they will just claim they were being friendly & you are a presumptuous bitch! No way to win in this situation.

Also, I love how men are so bad at picking up social cues in an “aw shucks, can’t help it” way when it comes to this, but AMAZING at it when it comes to being police, judges, inspectors, politicians, business people—-basically any place where such skills translate into actual money and don’t involve boners, men are…

But how many times do they interrupt random dudes reading something to strike up a convo? They know that shit is rude. They know they are “interrupting” — just like continually trying to talk to someone with headphones on. They know this person isn’t really trying to talk to them but the female-ness overcomes the…

Please. I was being quite courteous to you, despite the fact that you don’t know the basics of copyright law. (“He didn’t classify it as choreography, therefore it can’t be analyzed as choreography.”—Wrong. 17 USC 408; “You only have rights over a “particular representation” of a work.”—Wrong. — 17 USC 106) Nothing…

Very cool. People are SO MUCH more creative than me—its impressive.

Link! I wanna see!