Why's the dude that was defending Jenny McCarthy not here to talk about how everyone here is just a sheep who hates Chelsea because all the other sheeps do?
Why's the dude that was defending Jenny McCarthy not here to talk about how everyone here is just a sheep who hates Chelsea because all the other sheeps do?
**doesn't even only hurt the children. forgot one word. changes a lot.
I'll add I used to root for her. I thought she was funny, and charming. This was before the whole vaccine fiasco. Hurting people, especially when you can go back on it and don't... changes a lot of things.
I know it's horrible of me to assume that you're possibly defending her because she's hot. But... She's killed real people. We've had real epidemics of things that we had virtually wiped out with vaccines. We can't just laugh and chalk it all up to being kooky. She's ruined people. She took a study that was founded in…
My mother (and my father, when he was around) made it incredibly easy to drink. As such, I never really cared to do it. It wasn't "taboo" to do it. So, while I maybe had a sip or two, it was no big deal.
There's a book that's been out for ages about Crows and Ravens, and how smart they are. It's called "In the Company of Crows and Ravens", and it details all sorts of cool stuff about them. Like how they take care of their parents, etc etc.
Also, there's these crows outside my work that I feed from time to time. They…
...shock collars, maybe?
Slackers. I told my grandmother "Fuck You" at two years old (with proper understanding of how it was used) twice, and asked my great uncle if he shit himself after a particularly bad fart.
yeah, my mother swore like a sailor.
i seriously considered doing it when i was strapped for cash. like, seriously seriously.
couldn't figure out a safe way to do it, as people wanted to manually take them off me. NOPE.
Of course I can't speak for others, yadayadayada... but there have been times I've been with someone, and they suggest something racy in a semipublic (or well, holy) place, and it's not that I'd object to sex with them, it's that we could be caught, etc.
Mayybe (not likely) that's what they were going for?
...to be honest, that seems worse than having the rape in the first place. there's women (and men, i'm sure) who become very confused by their bodies responding to the stimuli, even when they themselves don't want the rape.
"but she wanted it, Sir, she was all sorts of wet by the end!"
ugh, i know a huge douchenozzle that reads. imagining him somehow being worse if he didnt is amazing.
That of course works as well. I just mean something completely un-"fappable" to.
Ooooh god. I remember doing that when I was a teenager! Oh god. The shameful, embarrassing memories.
I had a completely BRILLIANT plan for that reddit thing where they were taking creepshots. But I can't do it alone (i'd need upvotes so ya'll would have to do this too)
Of course it's not in a vacuum, and a continuum, etc etc. We teach girls to listen, and to communicate, all that. But while we should work towards equality, we do need to work with what we have, at the same time. And Goldieblox features things made without the narrative on their website. I took the narrative to be…
I dunno. I recall them saying that it isnt that you CANT be both. It's that you CAN be both, and that's okay. There's nothing wrong with pink. I'm a princess AND an XYZ.
I recall reading that testing they had done shown that girls learn a bit better with narrative. Like, getting told a story will help them understand the situation, and figuring things out. So, the building blocks come with stories that talk about it and show how to build it?
I kinda feel like reddit is so vast.. you can't really condemn or condone it at all. I mean, there's suicide help subreddits. There's things like redpill. There's also things like bluepill.
"So now that we know no one will buy the ninth set... we'll add another ending. that you have to purchase."