Classic victim blaming, right up to the blather about she 'needs to take responsibility.'

If you try any harder to avoid the point you might strain something

You know, when you hint very obviously that she should have expected debauchery, you're making it very clear that you ARE excusing it. Your criticism is for HER.

Ignorance isn't the problem. Knowledge is. They know they can get away with it, they know they'll get sympathy, even respect, and they know no one cares about women.

No, diddums, that's not what I'm saying at all, but seeing as how you showed your ass by ignoring my not-at-all subtle disgust with the double standard here——and the way you're whitewashing your hero's abuses——until you develop honesty and reading comprehension we're done.

Dismiss him and move on or before long you'll be treated to whiny rants about how men are the subject of a sooper sekkrit conspiracy

The person I was replying to was sure talking to one. As for Dawkins, at this point, it wouldn't take a lot before he's there.

He's been belligerant about the abuse of women....so, yeah. If he displayed the slightest hint of remorse at all....

Cycle of abuse my ass. Pokanski's defenders make the same arguments, while failing to explain how these douches conveniently victimize the people least likely to be believed or valued——and who do not, in fact, resemble the original abusers in any way. Said male molester defenders NEVER show up when women reveal…

He's an MRA troll.

How nice for you. He's a horrible victim blaming asshole to women, hostile to women who've been victimized, and has actually been hostile to the notion of abuse against women being taken seriously. Go to pharyngula and look up elevatorgate

He's been a horrible sexist to women in the atheist community.

Exactly! "Dear Muslima...." and all the horrible sexist crap he's done to women....

Well, he sure is an asshole to women who get molested or whatever, so..

That explains why he's been such an asshole to women all over the world then.

Yeah, except he's been victimizing women. At what point does he become responsible for his own actions?

Yeah, well, after Elevatorgate and the way he treats women I don't care. After a certain point he's responsible for making himself healthy. Instead, he's been victimizing people——and not the sort of people who victimized him. It's funny how he likes to attack the sort of people——women——-who didn't victimize him but…

I can't in good conscience call something "erotica" when its heroine calls her vagina "down there."

I can't in good conscience call something "erotica" when its heroine calls her vagina "down there."

Beyotch! Hands off my man. I looooooove him. Along with the rest of my imaginary harem. He just seems like such a kind guy.