Most of it falls awfully far short of B+ for that matter. (saying that as someone who has watched most/all of every series except the current pay-to-view one and the one before that - “Enterprise”? And all but one of the films (the most recent one, and who stood in line - IN LINE - for the midnight release of the very…

1. Three of those films have basically been disowned by most decent, upstanding people, and are now considered a bizarre aberration in a series that has ranged from good to great. If you discount the prequels, you might say Khan is better than some of the Star Wars films.

I’ll agree with Prince Ruprecht on this one, I think a lot of these guys had their “master piece”. Burton might have fallen off the quality cliff the farthest.

Iron Mike Sharp, that brings me back. That guy was so boring. My roommate and I taunted him and mocked him mercilessly from the safety of the upper reaches of the Montréal Forum back in the 80s. He was the worst wrestler, a bland guy with no hook who they couldn’t decide if he was a patsy heel or an undercard good guy…

Aronofsky has Black Swan and Mother! Burton has Edward Scissorhands, Sweeney Todd, and Batman. And Mann has Heat, and maybe The Insider.

Good call. For such a beloved and significant part of pop culture it’s striking how much of the Star Trek output is simply passable entertainment, neither awful nor truly great. Even the best ST films, like The Wrath of Khan, First Contact, and the reboot, are no masterpieces.

Roman. Roman always gets the spot.

I strongly disagree re: Del Toro and Wilco, but the Tom Cruise pick is so dead-on. I’d also throw McConaughey in the mix.

I don’t think there’s a single piece of Star Trek I’d give an A.

This is going to be REALLY controversial, but I’m gonna name Wes Anderson. He has an impeccable eye and sense of design and style, but at the expense of anything approaching warmth or spontaneity, because it is all so designed and arch and calls attention to itself, and more and more he has become wrapped up in…

“this clearly doesn’t affect me... some women are bothered by this”

It seems to me like you care quite a bit. You obviously care that SOME women are bothered by this. So, you’re the potty police. Get cracking.

I deputize you to police all Denny’s bathrooms. I’ll get you a nice sash with “Toilet Police” on it so that everyone knows you care way too fucking much where people potty.

I dunno, I’m more concerned about the nut job filming people in the bathroom.

Find your bridge, troll.

When I used to go to concerts a lot, you’d always seen a half dozen or more girls in the men’s bathroom because the lines were shorter. If nobody got their panties in a twist over that, then I think the line is “they’re not forcing you to look at their gentiles nor are they trying to look at yours”.

She’s a man because a random internet commenter and a deranged congressional candidate say she looks like one? Ok.....

Bonus points for holding a profession where people will ALWAYS Google your name before doing business with you.

Being known as the “Racist Lawyer” for the rest of your life is second only to being the “Crying Nazi.”

If the NY Post is giving you a hard time about racially insensitive remarks then you truly are the bottom of the barrel.