I was raised in Alaska and just wanted to confirm I'm interpreting this correctly—the map isn't a map of where forest fire activity is predicted—it's a map of inceasing drought, right? The reason I ask is that the far north area of Alaska with a dark red by 2100 has no trees at all—so obviously no forest fires. What…

"It takes as much faith for someone to believe there is a god as to believe there isn't one,"

So what they're really saying is that poor children are now going hungry.

the point was, people are so broke they stopped eating cheap bad food, now they are eating no food, which is cheaper because it is free. Starving will never cost anything. Hopefully. Otherwise, that would make a shitty situation even shittier.

Except health insurance isn't free...even with "obamacare"

You know what would get rid of obesity rates in poor families even faster? Getting rid of poor families...

It's probably because the poor can no longer afford to eat poorly, now they are just starving.

Maybe they just can't afford food since they are poor.

Why the misleading headline? This was not a "Presidential" veto. Obama did not personally veto anything. And if that was your attempt at trolling a headline, you failed miserably. Trolling is not just making shit up, it's an art; please leave it to the professionals.

It is "Democratic Party," not "Democrat Party," unless you are intentionally trying to channel Rush Limbaugh.

Limer, you should be ashamed of yourself for laying out this flamebait. Way to leave out the reason for the "veto" so all these lazy commenters who don't bother to read the real story comment with their heads up their asses. Fanbois, politics, and ignorance, a great combination.

Please don't be Fox News again, Eric. You don't need to be Fox News. Stop being Fox News. =/

Obama had nothing to do with this.

So the headline is false and misleading. Obama did not veto this ban, Michael Froman did. Nice journalism, there.

Do you not even read your own sources before you write your headlines? Obama had nothing to do with this. The decision was made by U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman. The President was not involved in any way.

Worst. Article. Ever.

Terrible "article". Bad grammar and syntax at times. Also very misleading. Obama didn't personally do shit (that we know).

It's hard to take a person seriously when they call it the "Democrat Party".

As others have pointed out, this article seems awfully misleading. PEOPLE: FOLLOW THE SOURCES BEFORE YOU COMMENT.

It is incredibly variable between women.