Their hosting services were probably completely automated and no one at the company were aware of the DailyStormer’s existence beyond being just a server name and an IP address. It’s only when people start putting in tickets and reports and warnings that actual humans look at what they are hosting.

You allow people to say whatever they want, but punish extremely harshly if what they say leads to death, violence, etc. The point of free speech is that the goverment can’t stop you from voicing your opinion, but committing other crimes, especially hate crimes aren’t free speech.

For your consideration.

Read up about north korean refugees trying to adapt to modern life in other countries. Often times it has nothing to do with their loyalty to their leader, but they are often completely handicapped socially and technologically from having spent their entire lives in a language and environment where basic fundamental…

Spaceballs.

7 years will probably turn into 2 years at a comfy private prison facility, followed by some parole/house arrest. He’ll be fine, and knew what he was signing up for when shit hit the fan.

They want to hold middle-management designated-fall-guy executives responsible.

I wonder how long before this gets filled with bots where you “meet up” at a marketing event or some promotional for a company and they try to sell you on a timeshare.

That’s called an internet chatroom.

It’s mostly about the US’s committments to NATO to stop expansionism of russia into other countries, such as Ukraine. Russia’s response to helping with the war on terror has been to largely ignore human rights violations and indiscriminately bomb civilians and support corrupt governments, instead of trying to…

I’m guessing that the actual strategy will involved hundreds of these.

Movies are movies, they’re entertainment either way. Both Interstellar and Dunkirk had the same writer and director. It’s a fair comparison to ask what the director’s intent with this movie was and why it’s worth seeing, and using Interstellar as a comparison for where the bar is set for what I would expect.

Kinja doesn’t allow comment editing (probably to encourage infighting) but thanks for explaining things a bit more in the comments. What I gather is that the movie is unique because it’s about soldiers against a faceless force of nature (the enemies aren’t shown) rather than trying to overcome a visible enemy, and the…

I guess that’s what worries me. I’ve come to expect that Nolan’s movies are not what they appear, and have some deeper concept or structure (Inception, Interstellar, Memento, etc.) behind them, but nothing in the marketing or reviews is saying that with Dunkirk, which seems a straightforward war movie.

But different how? It seems a complete failure of marketing that I don’t really know what makes this movie different than other war movies, and reading this review didn’t clarify that for me. I’m legitimately curious but I don’t see what makes it unique.

All movies are imaginary stories, and this one is fictionalized, it’s not a documentary. A lot of other movies have done “War is bad, this is a tragedy that happened”, I want to know what makes this one different.

I suppose that makes sense, but nothing I’ve seen about the movie leading up to this seems to have any relation to the current political climate.

So the angle for a casual movie-goer is just the spectacle of the disaster?

Someone give me a lowdown on this: Is this anything other than Saving Private Ryan 2017? Does it have a conceptual angle to stand out from other war movies, like Interstellar did to make it more than just another Sci-fi movie?

They’re not preventing you from graduating, they’re just withholding the diplomas. You also don’t have to prove enrollment, just acceptance, I believe.