To be honest, for half the price being only 3 seconds slower than the Z28 is a huge plus for the Mustang. For the price of a Z28 they could just throw some sticky rubber (something like the Z/28's "only street in name" racing tires) on it, different rear end gears, maybe wider tires, and I would bet it would have…

They need the GT350. They're comparing $60,000-$70,000 track and dragstrip cars to a $35,000 consumer Mustang and complaining that the Mustang is too muted.

Does this also take account of the expensive life insurance policy you'll need to take out too?

That usage is brought out of the selling price by the mileage added to the car. If you sell at a 3% profit and drive it, you're actually profiting even more than 3% because you didn't have to buy another car to drive during that time.

And even then, "profit" might mean less than a return, if you're making less than, say, 6% a year on appreciation, there are much more stable financial investments that would be better off than a car. Less than 3% a year and you're not even outrunning inflation. A 10% profit on a car you own for 3 years is nothing.

Bingo. Real estate investments are rarely valuable unless there is significant risk involved, and risk tends to decrease the more wealthy the investment. Cars are an extremely risky and very rarely, if ever, profitable investment, but when they do appreciated, they do well. (See: Old Ferraris, Ford GT, Corvette C2)

A list of engines I've seen put into a 240z: Ford 302, SBC, any LS motor (from 4.3 to 7.0), Modular V8, SR series, S20, RB series, VH45DE (with turbos!), any L series, Rover V8, 2JZ-GTE, KA24DE, Viper V10, BMW S14, S50, Lexus 1UZ, Mazda 13B (and 20B), Jaguar AJ6 and V12 and that's just what I can remember off the top…

Given the size of that engine bay, you could stuff the engine AND the transmission in front of the driver and run all sorts of adapters to the rear wheels.

Glickenhaus, is that you?

Did I say that? I don't think I did. I don't think I even mentioned his name or defended him.

I'd say 100MPH in some modern cars (most mid level or high end sedans, SUVs, etc.) is probably far safer than doing 55 in a 60s midsized sedan.

If you want to make money, you need low-cost low-power, lightweight, high-range EV bikes, not electric sportbikes. If you want to further the technology, you make electric sportbikes.

*Koenigsegg

Your voice sounds exactly how I would imagine it, Jason.

Between 80-95% of all drivers on Lake Shore drive break the speed limit, with 10% over 30mph over it. Great lakes states just don't give a fuck.

The problem is that they don't want to stop all of you from speeding. They just want enough that they can keep pulling people and take a revenue.

It means that if he was someone else and they wanted to throw the book on him, the Judge could have given him 180 days of jail time.

I can't imagine how many municipalities have 25 or 15mph speed limits coming off of a 70mph highway just to have revenue traps.

Well, it probably depends on how you define it. I'd say high risk industries are those that would have the highest frequency and probability of worker's death (not counting the death of other people who aren't employees) or serious injury relative to how much money is spent on safety and security and the height of the…

I said one of the highest risk industries. Illegal diamond mining and meth manufacturing are both high risk too.