I'm confused. Why should I shake my head on out of here? I think I was correct in being appalled at your victim shaming, don't you? I'm glad you rethought your position, but why do you think I should be silenced now for being right then?

Yes! This! Why are people acting like someone who has been violated has an obligation to shroud themselves in shame. These responses calling her out for how she presents herself are appalling and stunning.

No! They shouldn't have! She has the right to present herself as she chooses. Because she has been violated does NOT mean she has to act ashamed. SMH

"I get that the "it's my body and it's my choice" could play into it,"

What's up with this guy? Too cool to even try; meanwhile Goldblum is paradoxically both more natural and more stylish than anyone there.

Ernest Saves Christmas is my fave of the genre—much higher production values than the whole Kirk Cameron oeuvre.

The thing is, Andrews didn't look petrified, I didn't think. She asked a calm follow-up question and looked a little bemused. She seemed to handle it perfectly.

Well, yeah, Oklahoma, Alabama, football fans.

Right on. I signed up for a half marathon two days ago. Now, I'm just going to quit because Doug Barry totally crapped on my dreams.

And Katniss's original bow was homemade. Homemade crossbow may a bit tougher to pull off. (Ugh, gross, I just invoked my trivia knowledge of a YA novel)

I believe Matt Damon can drive cars on stairs and beat up multiple European cops at one time. Now, let me tell you what Hugh Jackman can do.

I have a friend who is an Egyptian archaeologist. He's told several hilarious Hawass stories. The man's a nut. I'm now 5 degrees of separation from Jay-Z.

Now, that is a story!

When it comes to "fair use" there is no "pure and simple." According to U.S. law there are 4 factors a court uses on a case by case basise in determining if a fair use defense is valid (http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html):

Goldiblox is a merchant. This is an ad to sell shit. This is not empowerment; it's co-opting! Stop saying artists have to bend over and let capitalists steal their songs. Yes, the song is stupid and the Beasties should be (and are) embarrassed by it, but it's theirs and a company selling things is the last entity that…

No, he doesn't. http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-196…

I have a much bigger story: I just saw a dog bite a man!

I know it's a long article, but if you read it, you would see the answer to your question several times over.

This is what's called a SLAPP suit (strategic lawsuit against public participation). Vile corporations like Kleargear use them knowing they won't win on the merits of the case but to frighten people into not criticizing them for being the scum-licking turd-slurpers they are; just like everyone working at Kleargear is.

Perhaps the young senator from Kentucky should be careful what he wishes for. In his surfing of the Internet to find words to say, he must have missed this story: