GasGuzzler
GasGuzzler
GasGuzzler

Hehehe . . .

If you can point to one quote in any of my posts where I have said that the Earth is not warming then I'll concede. I have not once said that. The science tells us the Earth warms and cools and has done so over time since the Earth was formed however many billions of years ago.

None, we have to assume everything is finite or the basis of economic markets goes out the window.

Wouldn't surprise me if there were some winks and nods behind closed doors!

Ah, a response with substance! But to speak as to the present value of future unknowns is impossible. The same applies to renewables and main other activities in which we engage. The market prices in what it can but there's no reason to hold oil more or less accountable than alternative forms of energy. Evaluated

Nice ad hominem. Let's keep it on topic here and figure out what the point of your argument is because I've yet to hear one.

Yep, oil dominated economies are taking a bath. Just so happens that it's of benefit to the US for a few of those nations: Russia, Iran, Venezuela.

Ugh, you alarmists need to give it a rest. I did not dispute the science, the Earth warms and cools, the science has told us that and I acknowledged it.

That's the $64,000 question, if I knew that I'd be rich! Not sure what it will do exactly but market fundamentals suggest that as the price has dropped so low, consumption (demand) will pick up and start escalating the price within a few months. We're talking about ~1% or so over supply in the market and there has

I work for an engineering company. We work for a good cross section of operators from small independents to fully integrated super majors.

I suppose this is where we fundamentally disagree. Every time the price of oil reaches new highs, the alarmists sound the horn of peak oil. And yet, we continue to discover more every day. We discover better ways to extract it and improve recoverable reserves. Every resource is assumed to be finite because

How long will cheap oil last and do you think it'll really have an impact on electric car sales?

Hellcat, of course. The answer is always Hellcat.

Neutral: What's In A Name? Do you care? Will you miss Chrysler?

I have, quite frankly unless we're talking the top models from Lamborghini and Ferrari, I don't perceive much in the way of build quality differences. The Viper has come a long way. Prior to the Gen V, I would 110% agree with you that the Viper was a kit car by comparison. No more.

"Do you think Ford's premium trucks are that much better than the ones from Chevy, GMC, or Ram? Or is the company just better and selling them?"

No need early on. Pentastar has been competitive in power and fuel economy from launch, Ward's 10 Best, etc. The early GM DI engines had some teething issues as fuel cleanliness standards have yet to catch up to engine needs. Chrysler being prudent again, let someone else wade in to the waters and find out the

5.7 in the Ram already has 395 . . . and there is an upgrade coming for the 5.7 as well.

What "reliability problems"? The kind CR reports or actual reliability problems? Chrysler vehicles have come a LONG way, suggest you check 'em out if you haven't!

305hp in Challenger trim. Considering no DI or anything super fancy the Pentastar is indeed a very stout powerplant. Can't wait for the turbo variants.