That's just top line revenue. Net Income was what killed it. $6.53 earnings per share compared to an expected $8.33 is HUGE.

Google Wave might have failed as it's own product, but many of it's best features made it into other products (simultaneous editing and better spell check, specifically).

Google is blaming RR Donnelley (the comm. company who's supposed to handle these releases) for sending it too soon. Also they said they won't start back trading until the report is actually finished. That sounds pretty indeterminate.

And this is serious. Investors should have confidence when a material-repeated report like earnings will be released.

First, no one outside top management should have pay affected by stock price. Ideally, everyone below top management should receive bonuses relative to their own production. If actual financial stability takes a hit, then everyone should expect their bonuses to take a hit because of that, but that has nothing to do…

My childhood dog was also a border collie who passed earlier this year.

Border collies are awesome.

"I suppose I'll have to wait on Google to iterate on the Nexus 7. Just give me that device with HDMI out and a microSD slot"

I wonder how pissed people are going to be if "No SD card" is one of the Nexus requirements.

I would do what Milford said.

FYI, he's responded to you.

So 1024x768 is looking more and more likely, which sucks.

Grooveshark was the best streaming service when their complete mobile app was only $3 a month. Now that's out and they cost almost as much as Spotify ($9 for mobile) and Spotify's mobile app kills Grooveshark.

"more than 80% of people on Twitter have less than 50 followers, so we can't say the average user has 208."

Thanks for that post and for your work as a science teacher.

The other defenders of the video in that thread also seem kind of coordinated around 2 circumstantial points (1. "It's too expensive to make THAT good a fake! I'm just a fisherman" and 2."Why would I fake that? You don't know what you're talking about.")

I agree that it was likely the decision of a single graphics designer and was never flagged by a superior, because they didn't realize it was someone else's design.

It's possible that the the guy claiming the video didn't do the editing. Especially if it's all GoPro viral marketing.

I'm not an expert at all this field, but something definitely didn't look right. Particular the fact that it goes from overcast when above water to what appears to be bright sunshine from the underwater view.

Does anyone here have an opinion on the legitimacy of those GoPro videos, specifically the dolphin one: