Here’s the simple fact: The Washington Post did journalism the right way, and Jezebel did not.

How is she covering for him here, at all? By telling what happened?

Yet when her husband shits all over black women she stays silent. And when her and her sisters constantly steal shit from black women she stays silent. And she defends Jeffree Star while trying to sell makeup to black women. Blac Chyna is no angel, but look up the racist shit her BFF Jonathan Cheban said about her.…

I’m sorry, but I disagree. If someone somewhere - anywhere - did anything ethically inappropriate or even questionable we should hold it over their heads for the rest of their lives, even if (maybe especially if, since they admitted wrongdoing) they apologized. And if they sincerely apologized? Well, hoo doggie, they…

Well, we’ve all heard this rumor.... From you, just now.

That’s...pretty much what I said, right? You’re probably responding to TheKinjaPlace. Kinja sucks.

I’ve seen no evidence of this being true. Unlike Weinstein, where the settlements and comments were out there, I haven’t heard anything like this for Tarantino. I would be surprised if it were true, given how fondly his exes have spoken of him, and how fondly his female actors regard him, and how many of them have…

Nice to see he’s really putting his foot down; not willing to toe the line.

Yeah, I’m a bit worried about how people seem to be conflating the two. I formerly worked in an industry where virtually everyone was cheating or had cheated on their spouse at some point. Most people had at least two divorces under their belts. A few of the guys would sleep with literally anyone who was willing.

You can be a womaniser without being a rapist. I’ve worked with womanisers before (as well as women who cheated on their husbands). I mean, it sucks for their spouses but as long as the people they’re involved with are willing (truly willing, not pressured into it), there’s nothing illegal about that. The temper is…

This is such a simple issue. David apologizes. Everyone that knows anything about him knows he is not racist. Both parties move on.

You genuinely have no fucking clue how memory works, so stop spouting bullshit privilege claims.

Or because human memory is imperfect. Especially if alcohol is involved.

All I’m saying here is -

I remember living in Wisconsin around the time of Favre’s first suggestion of retirement. Holy shit, you’d think the world was ending the way it dominated local news and conversation. It was beyond stupid to witness. He stayed on, but kept suggesting it every season until he actually followed through, and every time…

You have no idea nor does anyone else if he is the worst QB ever or a god.

I think there’s a critical difference between waiting until you have all the facts and really baselessly speculating. There’s a little of both in here, and some in between.

Just because there seems to be some confusion, anyone who thinks what I wrote is in any way a defense of ESPN is incorrect. ESPN is a great big pile of hypocritical shit and I agree with Burneko here about how fucked up it is that they want pats on the back for their nods towards diversity(and independent thought)…

Counterpoint... no.

Farrow and Allen started a relationship in 1980, they broke up in ‘92, that’s not decades. They never lived together. The photos of Previn were made when she was 20 or 21, not a teenager. Everything else, age gap, daughter of his partner, might be distasteful, but it’s not illegal (or that rare). Implanted memories…