Or instead of that, since there is a large quantity of the game available at launch, you can just order it at launch... Still costs exactly 0, and you don't have to bother with cancellations.

Even if you plan on buying it you should still wait until you know whether or not it's a flop. No point in giving them money when there is no guarantee of quality.

Looks like I'm not going to play it then, I was burned by Sony and Microsoft in the past, I will just stick to my PC for now. Until it comes to PC I'm not going to touch it. It's not worth a console purchase to me just for that one game.

Joe Chill is the guy that murdered Bruce Wayne's parents, basically it's just saying Alfred hired Joe Chill to kill them all so he could get the inheritance.

I'd rather see the card game from FFIX get released as a standalone upgraded game...

Who's to say he hasn't tried to have a conversation already?

So you assume that from just one side that it's his fault, but make it seem like a bad thing to assume the opposite? Yeah real unbiased there.

Never said I pirated, with a bit of talking you can get a free copy while buying PC parts in bulk.

1. Usually when talking to other people who build PC's, I never have an issue... we typically just are like, oh that's cool, or even make suggestions. Of course I'm actually the most experienced computer builder in my group of friends, so they are typically asking me for assistence

Innocent until proven guilty.

Except the case in question has nothing to do with that at all, it involves a card game. If this were some other developer then it might fit, however this isn't a video game, it doesn't promote a male dominated culture, and there are no sexualized women.

This is utter BS, as soon as there is any backlash you toss the comments away, and pretend it didn't happen.

I say we continue the discussion here. We bring in the comments Patricia had stated over on the other article. Don't let them hide this because it looks bad for her.

The moment she said he's most likely guilty…

No, you Considered him guilty.

At no point during the entire conversation did you ever say, until now that you presumed his innocence. All you did in the original comments was point out that according to statistics he is most likely guilty.

Only 2 of those sound appetizing... And it's not the Cappuccino, or the Wasabi Ginger. I'd even have a hard time with the Bacon Macaroni and Cheese one.

All of the reasons why your friend said his name is link are wrong. It originally came about when the game was going to be a past and future set up, where your character was the Link between those two worlds. They just ended up keeping it, after dropping all the future stuff that was planned.

No, it's safer to not jump to the conclusion that the accused are always guilty no matter what. It's called innocent until proven guilty.

Woah woah woah woah woah woah woah woooooooooah. Hold the hell up. No it's not worth considering. Just suggesting that is the worst thing you could do. It's called innocent until proven guilty. We don't look at statistics, and just assume the person did it. That is not at all how it works. We look at the evidence for…

Are you high or something right now? What are you even talking about at this point?

You do know the 1.5% to 8% statistic is from 1994 right? And more recent studies have shown upwards of 10-40%, and those are just ones that are submitted to police. That's not even counting facebook posts, like this one, which is not reported to police.

It's not a rational approach to try and cite outdated statistics as guilt.

The problem is, the statistics she cites and how she is assigning guilt to Temkin, by posting that original comment. All because of flawed statistics, she's already made up her mind on it, and it's ludicrous. It does nothing to help the situation, all it does is throwing more onto something that is already…