Saying it's as easy as flipping a switch shows you don't really know much about development. It's not like Sony is going to personally set up the games to do this for them, so they have to take their people and put time towards developing something that they wouldn't normally do.

Because it adds development cost to the game. They have to design to play on the ps4 and now they also have to design it to play on a Vita. With the already terribly high video game development costs out there, this just makes it even more expensive for them.

The guide was garbage and never mentioned this. More like I have my obsessive habits to thank for this.

Ah I didn't think it went through NeoGAF, I thought they just looked at the title of the video and accepted it right away. Thanks for clearing that up for me.

It's only showing the visiting. Basically, when you kill a boss on the 4th disc you visit the hideout, an a new person pops out.

I knew about this as well... I did it on my first playthough, and on my third playthrough where I went for 100%... I think kotaku might have just jumped the gun on this one. As a ton of people in the comments also say it's not new.

This is actually not new to me... I did this back when the game came out :/ I had no idea no one else knew about it...

No Monster Hunter 3 Ultimate? I know it's on the Wii U as well but they fit the entire damn game in portable form.

Games are cheaper on PC though. So instead of paying 60 bucks a game, a few weeks after a game is released you can get a 33% or 50% off sale. And even later into it's release up to 75%, and these deals happen all the time. So the used market doesn't need to exist on PC's. While on Consoles, these prices are rare.…

DLC covers that argument. DLC is essentially the work done to a game after a while. Such as parts added to a car.

And how is that paying for Microsoft passes? I never said anything about reactivating games. I said there most likely wasn't going to be a fee.

As their sources have said there are no plans to charge for used game reactivation.

http://www.polygon.com/2013/5/24/4362… not according to this.

The Didact's ship or something like that.

Question 1: Any sort of online tethering is unnaceptable. I would accept an offline mode that lasts as little as forever. Anything less than forever is a no buy for me as I live in an area with spotty connections, and I have an insanely low cap on my data usage.

Question 2: 40 dollars. With this new system they are…

The pony stickers make it go faster.

I would watch the hell out of a show that had a little girl that teleported boats whenever she touched peoples ears.

I'm not going to get either. I was hoping the xbox wouldn't do all this shit... I was wrong. This is garbage.

I live with 3 other people each who have their own gaming consoles. And we share games constantly. This kills that for me.

Their console might not be "always online" but requiring an internet connection once…

It means they will charge you to buy games you already have probably...

Yeah no... Saying the video of them crashing a funeral is "Hilarious" is fucking wrong. Even if it's in a virtual world, these people were morning the loss of a friend. A comrade. Someone they fought beside. That "Trolling" is in no way acceptable, or funny.

A high up EA person talking shit about a potential partner is a bad thing. Even if he doesn't speak for all of EA, he's still an important part of EA.