Agreed, I think they're meant to evoke these kinds of reactions. There are plenty of times when GoT glamorizes violence or uses nudity somewhat gratuitously, I just don't think any of the examples in this article fit that bill.

I don't understand why people are getting so argumentative about this, it's not that hard to avoid spoilers, you know, as long as you don't live on the internet. Any time I see "game of.." I just stop reading. For some things I don't mind spoilers cause they're not that important to me. But I avoided all spoilers for…

oh man, it's just like a woman to stare off vacantly towards a 4th wall rather than focus on this kid's score.

if you can get a note from your doctor it'll be allowed

ugh, god, I hope so. You gotta slip those suckers off beforehand.

oh man, think of the pickup lines this guy gets to use now though. It'll all be worth it in 6 months.

I kind of get what you're saying, and since there's a Tales of Symphonia add on this page that series suffers from the same name game, but what're you gonna do. It's part of a series.

I just finished Arkham Asylum and he was in it pretty heavily, so I was a bit surprised they're going with Scarecrow too. Driveable Batmobile though.

I'm sure it's exciting at first, but really what you're winning is a liability. I know for me, beyond the taxes, to insure that car would probably cost me three times more on insurance than I all ready pay. I'd be excited though, but only because I'd be thinking about how much cash I'd have if I sold it.

Not to mention the spike in insurance to add that thing to her policy. You'd only come out ahead if you sold it.

Good to see that internet users from all over the world are know-it-all-douchebags.

Haven't hurt anyone? They were controlling and manipulating humanity the whole time they've been on Earth. They're like the alien version of big bankers. Plus, it's the idea that you're being controlled or enslaved by an unseen force. They weren't predators, so the threat seems innocuous, but it is a threat.

The Silence weren't really scary on screen because they didn't kill or attack anyone we cared about. They showed them time and again just standing there, not attacking or anything. What it did do a good job of is giving you that fearful sense that you were missing something, that there's a threat and you don't know…

Even without the sexual harassment you know they'll be targeted first. The majority of their market is teenage boys after all.

I think the reality of the numbers aren't important at all. It's a video game, and the main point of the game is to immerse the player in the world. Regardless of how many women are in the armed forces there are plenty of women gamers who can't enjoy the 'whole experience' of the game, as it were. Plus who cares if…

Dangerous business putting them on the front line.. once they start their cycle the smell will completely give away their position. Also their not tuff n' stuff like us mens are... and they'll only have a rifle.. men have a rifle and a gun... so .. safer..

So wait, the game is being more inclusive towards all types of players but you're not satisfied because they weren't forced to do it through some 'major social movement'?

So wait.. is this stuff wrong too then?

Headline:

I know they said remote controlled but I didn't think they meant it was text to space, the future is yesterday!