I'm with your logic there but I dunno, Spider-man was my all time favorite comic book when I was a kid and it's somewhat disheartening to have almost 5 movies about him and none of them have gotten enough right about the character or his villains to really satisfy what I remember liking about him as a kid. My…

Oh for sure, it'll always make money, just like no amount of Schumachers can stop a Batman movie from making money. But the studio will budget out less and less as their returns grow smaller, making bad movies even worse.

http://screenrant.com/sebastian-stan…

I agree.. I guess. I still wouldn't want to see an X-men/Avengers crossover. Head nods, honorable mentions, cameos, sure. But a full scale crossover not so much. Fantastic Four And Spidey would have fit into Avengers in less overcrowded ways though.

I think it's more likely that Sony will wear out Spidey's welcome with the general population until no one gives a shit about it. They'll reboot it again, people wont care, and even then they wont let it go.

eh, it's not like Quicksilver is that big of a deal so who cares. Hopefully they make Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch Mutants still in the Avengers, but you know, just never talk about it or call it that. If they make them some crazy Hydra experiment I'd be disappointed. In general though, I wouldn't want to see the…

I just saw it was on Netflix the other day and had to watch it right away too

I think "a wheelchair is really gonna hinder the plot" is more like it. Just like beasts magic serum is to cut back on expensive cg effects. And before you say, 'but they did it the comics before,' I say there's a reason they always went back to formula in the end.

I scoured the article for one negative thing said about the new Treks and I just couldn't find it. You've become a bit defensive, maybe?

This is my point.

I'm not a fan of the first two X-men. They're the only 'good' ones, sure, but they're too many things wrong for me to really be into them.

Same reason they took the snout off the Lizard in Amazing Spiderman I assume, to give them a wider range of facial expressions.

Man, three season in and that's really the only right answer.

I don't think it looks horrible, but Fox and Singer have worn out any good graces I had for the franchise.

ooh.. shots fired.

oh man, it's just like a woman to stare off vacantly towards a 4th wall rather than focus on this kid's score.

I'm really not the biggest fan of it either, this or the John K one.

The Simpsons is still hand drawn but is now digitally painted. Not sure how they composite it, if they use After Effects or not.

if you can get a note from your doctor it'll be allowed

ugh, god, I hope so. You gotta slip those suckers off beforehand.