Word.

Well... Burton was just a producer on 9. The movie itself was based on a 10 minute short student animation (which most people consider better than the feature), and Burton just saw it and liked it.

...... "Beach-walker" ..... that's a hell of a title..

I was so excited way back when Blur put out the proof of concept for Goon. I thought it was just one of their many shorts, but I kept hearing that they were making a feature length movie, which I didn't think would ever happen, so I'm glad to hear news about this project again.

He's a prankster God

oh Newman..

the IBM Stellar Sphere, the Microsoft Galaxy, Planet Starbucks.. Ben & Jerry's Dragon Module. I think it works.

I don't agree that the character is a joke, I don't like Hugh Jackman's take on him though. Which isn't really his fault, it's how those terrible first three X-men movies wrote his character to be. I remember Wolverine from the old cartoon and comics from when I was a kid and I'd love to see that gruff no bullshit…

I'm with you on this one, even if the post is called "Morning Spoilers". But any time I see a Game of Thrones entry I just skip it. I haven't read the books and I want to go into the next season fresh. It's more fun that way.

I was thinking the same thing

Year, Cars 2 was a turning point for me for that studio. I used to think that their shorts department would be the saving grace, but I'm starting to feel like even there they're pigeonholing themselves into this "Pixar-style", and everything is starting to look the same.

I was pretty disappointed when I read about Pixar's lineup of sequels. I didn't mind three Toy Story's cause they were sort of like benchmarks for the studio. But then Cars 2/Planes.. this Monsters University, and now Finding Nemo 2? I mean, i get why it's a good business decision, it probably costs half as much to…

I thought you were talking about a SpaceX Mars trip.. I think SpaceX is great for the US space program, you don't have to try to convince me. It makes more sense for NASA to pay a company to take care of low-earth orbit deliveries, especially if they're doing it cheaper and faster. I just don't think SpaceX will…

Mars-one is the silliest idea I've heard come out of all the recent space news. For me, it's like Obama's "we've all ready been to the moon.... lets go to Mars" crap. If setting up a colony on Mars is the goal, wouldn't you first want to test the process by say.. setting up a colony on the Moon? At the very least,…

You know that whenever you see one black hole there's bound to be dozens that you're not seeing.. Can never be too safe, I say.

I think it's a great partnership. If NASA utilized SpaceX and other companies to develop rockets or take care of low earth orbit missions it'll open them up for lunar bases and Mars missions and deep space exploration. NASA couldn't do that stuff without SpaceX freeing up their routine deliveries and SpaceX couldn't…

Yeah, I don't know what that's supposed to mean, I guess. Anyone can plan to do something. MarsOne plans on setting up one-way-trip-colonies on Mars. NASA planned to return to the moon by 2020. The Soviet Union planned to beat us to the moon. ..etc..

You know, I hear that it costs them less, but I guess I don't understand where that idea comes from. How is it less expensive for SpaceX? It's the same procedure. As I understand it, NASA commissions these missions from SpaceX. And that's on top of the $400 or $500 million they gave them for the initial start-up…

Man, I hate this attitude, like SpaceX is some kind of super space pioneer company. It's a taxi service, not a space program. Like NASA has lost their edge or something? Look at what NASA started with the Constellation Program, the new heavy lift rocket, the Orion spacecraft, the Altair lunar lander.. I guarantee…

What I find more impressive about this is that 50 years ago NASA had to calculate the math manually with a room full of super smart people. It boggles my mind to think what we could do in space if only we funded it now like we did then.