FoxKit
FoxKit
FoxKit

Virtually everything she says is vomit.

Every player occupies the same universe, so it is, technically, a multiplayer game. However, as a thought experiment, let’s say every living man, woman, and child on Earth buys the game today and is online at the same time (about 7.125 billion people). Every single one of them is on a planet (not in space, on a space

There are billions of NPCs to trade and interact with, but it’s not a multiplayer game and will never be, so... I guess deal with that.

Sorry, this is not the game for you. Sounds like what you're looking for is Destiny, that's already out, I recommend getting a few friends together for that.

Consider it a single-player game. The odds of finding another player at all are magnitudes rarer than winning the lottery.

Keep in mind only the first batch of discs are going to need the update, later pressings should have the most recent software version.

If these patch notes are correct, and I have no reason to believe they are not, the game will actually deliver more content than they promised; dare I say it may have even been under hyped?

Looks like a soulless, rote, shallow version of a franchise we all loved and treasured. So yep, it’s a modern Nintendo game, all right!

This logo is absolute genius. Back to the original font, subtle texturing, bold color choices, and working in the number without being obnoxious about it like F3AR was. Just all around fantastic.

No way, the release date for Deus Ex is February 23rd! Oh wait, they delayed it 6 months after running their tiered pre-order program. So you're probably not picking that one up anymore either, right?

That quote is in relation to other players. There’s plenty of battles against npcs you can get into without attracting the robot’s attention.

Similar to Dark Souls, No Man’s Sky won’t really have a plot, more world-building lore you pick up piece by piece. You kind of get what you put into it. Sounds like if you need more of a narrative, it’s not going to hold your interest.

To go to new, interesting planets, to fight bigger, more powerful things, to pick up new tidbits of lore and setting information, and eventually make it to the center of the galaxy where, most likely, a cutscene is waiting for you before you jet off to explore the other 99.9% of the game that no one will ever see.

In that case, we are in agreement. :3

I didn’t read it quite that way. I agree that people need to try to improve their situation, but St. John makes it a racial issue. If white men can be successful in tech, why isn’t everyone else? He asks rhetorically. He implies that minorities aren’t willing to put in the effort to “bootstrap” their own tech

Sorry, I was debating less with you and more with the Alex St. John quote. I agree with you, but I still disagree with St. John’s assertion. By saying “It’s an obvious opportunity to everybody isn’t it? If you are a different race, gender, or religion… what’s your excuse?” he implies that laziness is the only barrier

I agree, but trying to fix a culture of disenfranchisement is a lot different than a singular concept like slavery or segregation. The problem is nebulous, hard to pin down, and pervades almost every aspect of our lives. I agree that we need to try, but don't trivialize it by making it sound easy. By trying to change

I don’t understand that at all. I’m sure it’s different when you’re told your whole life that “you can do anything you set your mind to,” but these people who are at a “disadvantage” as you put it are dealing with a lot more subliminal issues. Entering a STEM field is rarely a prospect for women and people of color

You say “agenda,” I say “authorial intent.” Art without a message is quite a useless, boring thing.