Yes on the 308 the interval is longer and there is no need to engine out service to replace the belt. The 430 has a chain.

Its the design not the material. Sure it does not have to be done every 2 years even if the car has only 3k miles on it. But Ferrari has that as the service interval and if it fails then the engine grenades. Hence few people challange it.

308's and 430's are not that bad esp as they do not have the timing belt problems that require engine out service every 2 years.

And people wonder why the 355 and and 360 are so cheap vs a 430. Its not age or performance, but the cost of ownership. ESP that pesky timing belt that they finally resolved in the 430 that no longer required engine out replacement every 2 years regardless of miles. Keep in mind I am talking sales price not asking…

I love that Fo Sho....

Thank you I will be here all week.

Odd, I’ve read otherwise except for a short time period for Dodge...

http://www.flachbau.com/

Here is an idea... Put it on the roof over a path, create shade, and it will cost way less as you do not need exotic solar panels that can be walked or road on.

No... But don’t trust me trust Forbes.

Umm they did more then that, have you wondered why your gas is so cheap?

I’d pay money for Trump to be evacted using the Fulton System... (Side note I saw them do it at an airshow about 2 decades ago. Not Trump mind you but a bright Orange Dummy, so somewhat similar.)

In other news Uber is acting like every other startup on the planet... Oh Jalopnik reporting like a suit has been won and the facts are alleged are true... It must be a day that ends in a “y.”

If you have a fetish for sleeping with your hand between 2 pillows this is the perfect car.

You cannot argue the defintion of a legal term vs a term with no legal meaning.

Well I was thinking about having sex in 2017... not so much anymore...

So no you do not understand... you fail to see the point, so either stupid or troll.

You understand what a legal term is and just a term? Huge difference

Self Driving is not a defined legal term, CA has defined autonomous, and uber does not meet that requirement as defined by CA, so why should uber pay the fee which tacitly changes the legeal classification and adds to a bunch of other issues that they do not want/have to deal with at this time?

Troll or stupid?

How do you expand on the basic fact, of why uber is not paying the fee. It has nothing to do with the cost of the cost of the fee, but they do not want the added legal aspects of the cars being classified as autonomous, when they feel they are not meeting the requirement of them.