Any war between China and the US, two large nuclear powers, would not revolve around standard warfare.

People said the same of Microsoft, in fairness.

The difference is that Steam is increasingly becoming a requirement for games. It is possible, in theory, that this integration could allow for a game to be graded against each build of steam machine.

You don't understand how lazy people are.

Aye. I wish I could remove my comment; I made it on my knowledge of the previous system. This article didn't really explicitly explain that they had brought in a new one and I only skim-read it.

Ah, right, I see you were talking about youtubers in the sense of the ones who are unaffiliated with any larger group. I apologise if I appeared somewhat aggressive. I do agree with your sentiment that betting their livelihood on youtube without a partnership or suchlike is somewhat foolish.

incredibly unlikely that you were actually paying them

did you pay to use that factory

The cost to them is somewhere around 90% of the ad revenue. If you can't understand the basics of service-based contracts then don't talk about it.

Ah. My mistake. I misread "Your publisher" as "a publisher."

NO FUN ALLOWED.

They are not, in many cases, legally entitled to do it. Nor do they wish to in many cases. It's youtube being shit.

The machine was part of the agreements put in place to allow youtube to continue.

It's not really their fault. They can't be any more lenient without the law cracking down on them and causing ridiculous fines for things they didn't do.

2 million you say? There are more than 2 billion PCs. Step up your game, Xbone!

Actually, they started this a good amount of time before TBC.

The difference between religious wars and wars for land is that religious wars tend to be somewhat more genocidal and bloodthirsty. When you use religion as the excuse for war it skews someone's sense of morality and ethics. You aren't fighting other people with families; You are fighting demons with glory in the…

Morality is, indeed, something that should be taught and expanded upon in a dialogue. Sadly it has been the case - not in the minority, - for several centuries that religion was the be-all and end-all on moral/ethical guidance.

The problem with religious texts of any kind is the ambiguity they contain and how they have been used as a result of this. I won't go on about the burden of proof, (although what the guy above said is true.) The main problem is due to how one part of some text will say "Murder is bad! Don't do that!" whilst another…

I think it's more just a desperate hope that this will be popular. Sorta a way to fight CoD and other bland FPS games. (Or at least bring on something more interesting than modern military FPS.)