Ok. I'll bite. I'll address your 'points'.

I'm sorry, once again, but you don't seem to understand what a strawman is yet. Go google it some time. Expand your knowledge. Then you can come back to me and apologise for making an arse of yourself.

Oh. I'm sorry. I forgot that I might hurt the feelings of the psychopath. Poor you. Truly you, the one who believes that being cynical is equivalent to gassing the Jews is a victim here.

Dude. Don't even bother. This is one hella dedicated troll. He deletes comments he simply can't argue against. He leaves a few that aren't specifically contrary to his 'point.' And he argues against people using hyperbole, strawman, bigoted prejudice and dismissal.

I'd rather be normal than a psychopath like yourself. Sorry, it's nothing personal. I just don't believe genocide is ever justifiable like you clearly do.

Seems like you have censorship in common with the devs of this game.

Yes. We all know that criticising both large and small games is equal to the attempted genocide of millions...

Kinja is kinda being terrible right now.

I hadn't thought about a mono-type run! That sounds interesting. I feel like this entire thread is an answer to my difficulty problem the other week. I have done nuzlocke runs but I am quite good at min-maxing so they were never really a problem.

The communist system inserted removed rights from people which had them.

Goodness

Li, Minqi (2009). The Rise of China and the Demise of the Capitalist World Economy. Monthly Review Press. p.41 ISBN 978-1-58367-182-5. Li compares official crude death rates for the years 1959 - 1962 (11.98, 14.59, 25.43, and 14.24 per thousand, respectively) with the "nationwide crude death rate reported by the…

Mass famines were already a problem. And I'm sorry but you can't expect medical aid to suddenly be installed overnight for an impoverished nation with one of the largest populations in the world. It took time but it was gradually installed in more areas during his regime.

Hitler's policies involved the genocide of a large group of people who were not dying in massive amounts. The deaths due to Mao's policies were due to poor administration and saved more lives than they killed. Your comparison is just completely inept and doesn't even focus on the part I am talking about. As such I can…

I was talking about the growth of the population. Before Mao it was impossible to have a large family due to lack of food. There was no medical help for midwives during births. There was no protection against mass famines that happened regularly and constantly. There was no protection against basic illness of any kind.

I think it's more a case of celebrating the man who, arguably, brought an end to the time of troubles. Life under the warlords was far worse, make no mistake. What Mao did is inexcusable but he could be argued to have favoured a policy of working towards the greater good.

I'm sorry but the US government lead one of the most successful genocides in history. I can't accept that they are any less ruthless than China under Mao. People were already dying under the warlords on a far more horrific scale than under Mao. Have you heard of the idea of one dying to save a thousand? His decision…

The only perspective you need is that they are all mass-murderers whose crimes lead to the deaths of millions. The murder of even one is more than enough to indict them.

I'm sorry but when you take a country that has several million deaths per year due to warlords and a barbaric regime and transform it against the will of those warlords you are going to end up having quite a few million more deaths.

PS: Why is it false-consensus when I acknowledge you have a different opinion of him than me, albeit one I don't understand, and that others are of the same opinion?