I second.
I second.
Good one
I'm willing to give it a D-I-Y try. Instructables?
I think it should be shot into space IF the cable were to snap close to the ground, but if it snaps higher up there would be two pieces left: the upper one being shot into space and the lower one falling back to the ground.
SIX DAYS? Crybabies! I have been TWENTY EIGHT DAYS with nothing more than muzak and tech support zombies from my ISP (socialist CANTV in Venezuela).
I built a "lamp" using a 15Kohm resistor, a diode, and a very dim blue LED peeking from a common AC power plug, and keep it plugged in at all times (it draws less than 1mA) pointing from above to the wc.
I think we have to thank wikipedia's blackout, wich made the public aware of the issue. Before that it was mostly only us tech types.
Google, AOL and OpenDNS should ban SOPA supporter's websites' DNS entries. Facebook, Twitter, gmail, Youtube, etc. should suspend SOPA supporter's accounts. How are they going to stay in business? Handing flyers?
Off to buy oranges...
"... provide your email address and the app will register you for an account, package up your wireless settings..." I don't see the need for an intermediary to backup/copy/sync supposedly private wifi settings. Now, where is my tinfoil hat?
I expected spoilers in the comments, so I didn't scroll down... but, as always, google is your friend:
I always perceived the windshied as the hairline
What If I need bifocals and can't see the phone either?
I use my computer to play music when I am at the computer, so I don't need a remote. I think I'd use a web interface and my phone over wifi if I came to use a dedicated computer to play music.
* Until the day it is you who is old and possibly lonely, and like the the surviving, increasingly younger part of your family to visit once in a while. Imagine being 70 and having xmas alone with the TV.
Good answer, as long as your parents (like mine) are genuinely interested in making you happy and not in making you happy in the way they think you should be happy.
Rule #1: Preemptive visit / call, as often as possible and as briefly as needed, before THEY visit YOU.
I want to reasonably believe, and I'm not buying the processing artifact explanation (despite being the most probable). If it were so, why Mercury's image is not followed by the artifact all the time but only during the CME (while the CME disrupts the ship's cloaking field hehe)?