I totally understand they help people. There is just this weird pseudoscience thread that flows through. It’s also weird that a lot of new chiropractic thought is aligned with this fundamental Christianity that was always so odd to me when he was in school, considering the foundation of chiropractic was decidedly…

A completely anecdotal story (obviously):

I have an Indian friend named Anita. I also know some Korean-Americans named Christine, Kimberly, and Larry. What would make their names more “appropriate?”

Yeah, I have BDD and a history of anorexia and this sounds like a a sure fire way to get me into a MAJOR relapse. Also, taking laxatives all the time is horrible for you, especially long-term. Some people never recover the full/proper use of their bowels. This whole thing sounds awful.

I was married (am no longer!!) to a chiropractor that LOVED places like this. I have many opinions on chiropractors (I actually helped put him through school- I was young!!) and none are very positive.

This is the biggest flaw in the logic of these so-called “Bathroom Bills” and it reveals what the intended outcomes actually are. NO ONE believes that a sign on a bathroom door will stop someone who is determined to assault another person, not even the GOP lawmakers introducing these laws. They ONLY care about…

The faulty logic behind stuff like this is telling. This campaign has always been about a lot more than “protecting women and children.” It’s clear from the subtext of the discussion that it’s also become a way for these groups to reassert their social norms and reassure each other that trans people are perverts.

BAN CIS MEN. FROM EVERYTHING.

Gary Steiner is cisgendered.

Spoiler alert: men assaulting women in the bathroom (anyone assaulting anyone in the bathroom) is already illegal. It has absolutely nothing to do with letting trans people use the bathrooms for their intended purpose (you know, like all humans need to).

And yet, a scumbag used condom of a troll seems to think objecting to this fucktard’s behavior is “pearl-clutching.” They get so fucking angry when we deny them access to our bodies whenever they want. I take comfort in the possibility of reincarnation. Each and every POS male will have to live as a woman. Preferably…

Right? Ever since I heard about this I thought what? Why not an Amazon? Or Hera to the Bull Zeus. Or I dunno literally anything that is not completely infantilising.

I’m still kind of mad that ‘female empowerment’ is embodied by a girl, rather than a grown-ass woman. But I guess girls are non-threatening enough to not crush the testicles of these manbabies....

I guess it’s hilarious if you’ve never been grabbed by a guy or been the subject of harassment and vile words at work or on the street. Congratulations for that.

At the very least he’s normalizing it. He’s also shitting all over an attempted symbol of women’s empowerment. Earth to Wall Street, you might want to clean up your image with real changes if you don’t want to be viewed this way. You own this image now.

It’s simulated pedophilia. The entire reason he’s doing this is because the statue is of a female child.

I mean I still think there should be a line between humping an inanimate object and actual pedophilia which involves a real human child, but I don’t disagree that this is very disturbing. The fact that it doesn’t register as repulsive to him is just gross.

Probably the type of dude who laughs at pedophilia jokes and congratulates underage boys who’ve been raped (“Way to score, bro!!”)

Honestly I wonder if this qualifies as borderline pedophilia. Beyond the stupidity of humping a statue, there should have been a thought going ‘hey, maybe I shouldn’t do this to a statue of a small child, because joking about fucking and rubbing my body against an image of a young girl is wrong’ through his head,…

Life imitates art.