Even if you want to separate them (as if you don't really believe that being a straight white male means you've hit the privilege jackpot), then my point still stands. There's never been a single, monolithic group called "males" or "whites" who have ever held all "the powah" and privilege.

Sexually hungup compared to who? Where does this myth about "puritan" American culture come from? The reality - and don't shoot the messenger here - is that American women have a global reputation for being some of the easiest and biggest sluts in the world. Hardly sexually repressed.

We can't be that privileged if we don't have a white history month or a white pride parade.

There is no single, monolithic group called "straight white males" who collectively hold all "the powah", historically or currently.

Lesbian relationships actually have a higher rate of domestic violence, and it tends to be the most brutal too.

How about we just accept that privilege and discrimination manifests itself in many different ways, and that all people, of all races/genders/sexualities/etc, experience both in some form? All this competing to be the biggest victim in the Oppression Olympics is pretty childish and pathetic, to be honest. Everyone has…

The concept of thin privilege is just as ridiculous as male or white privilege. Too many people just want to be victims, with the Protected Status and special rights that come with it.

Many people would argue that feminism and the victimhood industry in general is a mental disorder, too.

You can whine about the "racism" and scream "But white guys do it too!" (yeah right, when was the last time that actually happened), but we both know this cab driver is going to be of a certain "hue".

Someone once described Obama as "snarky", and I think they pretty much nailed it perfectly. He's such a petty and small man...very thin-skinned. The only time you'll see a flare of hatred in Obama's eyes is when someone disagrees with him, or a journalist asks him a question he doesn't like.

It's hideous. She has an unlimited clothes budget and the best fashion advisers money can buy, and this is the best they can come up with? And why is she still wearing those weird belt things?

"you should be so lucky...."

Most slut shaming is done by other women. I'm all for it, by the way. Nobody has the right to not be judged for their behaviour.

They don't, this only exists in the deluded imaginations of feminists. "Enjoying sex" is not the same thing as being a dirty whore. There's a difference.

She's a slut, and making up euphemisms like "sexually liberated women" to describe sluts won't stop slut shaming. If you don't like being shamed, then don't be a slut. It's that simple.

It's not misogynist to point out that it's possible this girl was involved in the murders.

In many countries, 16 is old enough to legally do all of the above, including have affairs with 4o year old men. At the very least, 16 should be old enough to know that conspiring to kill your own family is a bad idea, and old enough to face the consequences as an adult.

If the "victim" turns out to be a co-conspirator in the murder of her family, are you going to apologize?

I don't know about the affair, but if it turns out she conspired with DiMaggio to have her family killed, they'll try her as an adult, and rightfully so. She's 16, that's old enough to know what she's doing.

How do you know? Were you there? It wouldn't be the first time someone has conspired with a "lover" to have their family killed.