There's nothing irrational about it. If black males are the ones who are mugging, raping and shooting everybody, it's rational for the police to target them, and naturally that's who the public are going to be worried about. When was the last time anyone was mugged or raped by elderly white woman?

1-3 —- The dictionary definition was fine. It wasn't too simplistic, it was just that people who were racist against whites wanted to not be held to account for it, and so they recruited an army of sociologists who were more happy than to spend their lives coming up with convoluted and dishonest reasons to help them…

Profiling and discrimination is a tool to combat crime. Are the police supposed to ignore reality and their common sense, and instead start stopping and frisking elderly white women just to be politically correct, and avoid hurting the feelings of criminal minorities? "Profiling" hurts nobody who isn't breaking the…

I've read the sociology books, and I've been in the thinly-veiled Marxist classes that call themselves sociology, Women's Studies, Whiteness Studies, etc, and I'm already familiar with their own made-up definition of "racism". I just don't accept it. Why would I? I don't accept their shifting of the goalposts, and…

It's quite revealing how mixed people almost always identify with their non-white ancestry. Kind of puts to bed the idea that there's such a thing as white privilege. In the past, when there was actual racial discrimination and white privilege, mixed people would always identify more strongly with their white side, in…

Why does it always have to be a competition to see who has the most oppreshuns? It's really not that hard to oppose all racism, regardless of who's doing it or who it's aimed at. Making excuses or trying to minimize black racism isn't doing anybody any favors.

What? You are the upper middle class hipster bro. Just because your life is privileged, it doesn't mean "white privilege" is a real thing, and it doesn't mean "ordinary" whites don't face greater struggles than minorities.

The problem with people like you is that you assume equality of outcome must be the same as equality of opportunity. Minorities have the same opportunities as white people; if certain minorities are under-represented in college or some areas of employment, it's not proof that there isn't a level playing field, and it…

It helps people in rural areas, it's not meant to help whites specifically.

First of all, why do you assume that "economic interests" must take priority over everything else? What if our racial interests are more important? Why shouldn't whites for their own racial interest like everyone else?

I don't see why you have to be so niggardly about it. Why are you people incapable of having a civil discussion?

"You can't be racist against white people because racism (unlike prejudice, which you might be confusing it with) is a systematic cultural pattern of perceived racial superiority that is reinforced and maintained by powerful institutions that systematically accumulate and retain political and economic power in the…

No...ones who think it's acceptable to call people "cracker".

China is colonizing Africa, but yeah, war is inevitable.

Nonsense. If an "ordinary" white male went into one of these upscale fashion stores, he'd get the side eye too.

I blame white males.

Speaking of intent, you claimed to be white, but you look more Hispanic to me. I think your only intent here is trolling.

He called it a "thinly veiled affirmative action program". It's quite clear what he meant and what he was suggesting, you little troll.

Does he have any proof that these were designed to benefit white people, specifically? Of course not, and to suggest any sinister or hidden motivation otherwise is slander.

That's a pretty slanderous accusation to make.