FeloniousReverend
FeloniousReverend
FeloniousReverend

I would totally watch a football game requiring all touchdowns to have to previously have travelled 50+ yards.

That build-basic.com is one of the better diy sites I’ve seen, thanks for sharing.

I don’t know what it says about me as a beer drinker, but I always wonder why people bother making/buying these for six packs of regular bottles. I almost always have a bottle opener nearby, and they generally always sell six packs of 12oz bottles in easy to carry containers.

You show me one of these for 22oz bombers,

How would they go educate themselves? By going and reading what someone else has wrote explaining the subject? THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT THEY’RE ASKING YOU TO DO! Write something for them to read explaining it to them.

If you even can...

Then the betting sites just use software load-balancing with a health check on the API response, which when it fails, automatically forwards from a different assignemend management IP, or outboun NAT’d IP. So let’s say they just need 4 IPs at a time to send their requests from and as they get banned they fail over to

You keep bringing up the no-fly list as if it’s a point in and of itself. We both agree that it shouldn’t exist, I’ve just been saying that if the list does exist, which it does, and legal system is fine with it, which it is, and the majority of Americans seem to be fine with it, which they are... Then whether or not

It’s legal, as long as you can claim that you were unaware that they were a felon or otherwise not allowed to own a firearm. You can sell someone a firearm for cash and they are not required to register it in their name in any way, in fact I don’t even know if there is a way to officially transfer ownership here. You

I don’t know the specifics of how people get on the list, I’m not sure anybody does. Which is clearly a problem. I don’t even think the list should exist as it’s stupid and just there to make people feel better. All I’m saying is that if does exist and everybody is totally fine with the concept of limiting someone’s

Just so we’re clear, I totally agree with this.

Yes, it’s called the no-fly list, it already exists, and everybody is ok with it. Especially the GOP. Except when people want to extend that list to guns, then all of a sudden it’s wildly inappropriate. How hard did you fight against the Patriot Act? Or the no-fly list, or it’s continued use? Or did you only start

How is that power in my hands and not yours? How do you not have the power to stop people from taking away your unlimited access to weapons? Are you okay with people not being able to own automatic weapons? Or do you think private citizens should have shoulder mounted surface-to-air missiles? What about a tank? There

I was responding to you comment “You’re just ok with it when it’s in your hands. How do you not see the danger?” So if not my assumption that you were talking about some sort of metaphorical “power” what exactly were talking about?

Except I wasn’t saying ban all religion or anything, my post specifically calls out that Christians get up to worse trouble on a regular basis than anyone else in America, and then after them maybe we should worry about the Muslims. That’s as an argument for people who think we’re in some grave danger from Muslims,

What exactly is in my hands? The power? Are you arguing that we are all weak and toil under some oligarchy, but then at the same time some individual citizen from a small farming community has some immense power because I’ve voted Democrat more often than not and that party happens to have a sitting president at the

Wow, that was such a pithy and yet wise sounding retort... Well done. Even though it doesn’t make any god damn sense in response to what I wrote.

You act like any of this is new, and it’s just President Obama and the current Democrats who have done this, and not something that has been happening for generations. In

Is there really a push by Republicans to get rid of the no-fly list? That seems totally contrary to their usual stance of racial profiling and stereotyping is okay, as long is it’s on foreigners with funny names, and not anti-government white people who are actively promoting a narrative requiring them to fight

Is that literally what Democrats are fighting for? Because as far as I’m aware only the presumptive Republican nominee is running on a platform of banning Muslims from entering the country and putting together a registry of anyone who identifies as Muslim.

Also again, how would this even help? How many of the the worst

You totally get it! Especially since the majority of the people committing these acts were born in America, or became citizens when they were children. How many of them were committed by people who came here illegally or overstayed their visa? So your whole theory about the INS and Border Patrol is just furthering the

Are we just assuming it’s a soundproof room because it has the fancy eggshell foam on the walls? Because that stuff isn’t soundproofing, it’s to remove echos and make sound recording crisper. The walls themselves would have to have been built or filled with soundproofing, or he’d essentially have to have concrete