A lot of people want pre-ordering and "Early Access" to stop because it's garbage, that's been a conversation in the community for a while but it's up against corporate greed.

After 2, I can't get excited. How is this one supposed to be better? Is there base building like a Mother Base mechanic thing?

I don't think they care.

Well...no not really. Plus, how were Jon and Adam doxxed?

How do you doxx Adam Baldwin and JonTron when everyone knows their names? JonTron isn't really a GGer either, he just happened to say "retarded" and that there shouldn't be an uproar over Zoe Quinn, and Tumblr went APESHIT on him.

They will, and people will keep doing it. Nothing will change.

How can you shut down an idea? Why don't you go shut down terrorism? Oh...wait...

Wait, what? Where did he do that?

I think it's more common than you'd think, even in other industries. Women/Minorities advocating for change don't do too well. It's all the same people wanting them to shut up.

Every time I see Humble Bundle I can only think of Mega64. "I don't think your bundle is so humble if you're looking for a handout!"

You still don't understand why I brought it up even though I've explained it no less than 3 times?

OH MY GOD, ARE YOU BRAIN DEAD? STOP TALKING ABOUT THE LOOTERS AND OWS SHIT! ALL IT WAS, WAS TO COMPARE HOW SILLY YOUR RESPONSE IS VERSUS THOSE RESPONSES! HOLY SHIT! ANYONE CAN BE A PART OF GG! GG IS A FUCKING TWITTER HASHTAG!

It's not though, you don't dictate what it means. Sorry bro. It's a disparate political philosophy with many branches, and the arrogance to say "No, it can't mean X because I said so" is astounding. It's like claiming Anarchism is only breaking shit because some idiots say so.

That's not a strawman, that's how your posts actually read and saying if you support journalism ethics you support abuse of women...that's EXACTLY what you're saying.

Yes...but it's becoming worse, and that's my point. Anyone can be bought off, so the whole "go somewhere else" means nothing when that's the case.

See, but that's not really true actually since you can be a Libertarian and be pro-government services. That's my whole point. It actually starts from "freedom", not "less government". It's in the name for crying out loud.

No, I don't think you know what a strawman is. A strawman is when someone invents your argument and attacks it. Did you just learn about logical fallacies or something? You keep saying them incorrectly.

Thing is, that's what it's about. People ARE researching, but when the people who do the reviews are bought off, the well is poisoned. If you can't know who to trust, how can you trust anyone?

So you realize that libertarianism isn't a singular entity, then why did you decry it as a singular entity prior? Why didn't you identify Libertarian Socialism, which is very much the opposite of "fuck you, got mine"? At it's core, libertarianism is about "liberty", and people disagree on what that means. I think it…