ExParte
ExParte
ExParte

I think when you see one, you're supposed to attack it as fiercely as possible, right?? We can't risk them wandering around unchecked.

Yesssss. Projector magically transforms 4 player split screen into 4 solo screens. So glad we live in this age!

I literally did not know parody porn exists. I don't know why it makes me feel better, but it does.

If you aren't a huge PC gamer, but want a decent gaming mouse in your bullpen for special occasions, you can't go wrong with this $8 Etekcity model. Even at that low price, you get three different sensitivity levels, blue lighting, and two side buttons for browsing. [Etekcity Scroll S200 High Precision 1600 DPI Wired

...said no believable person ever.

From every rooftop now, please...

Because most of them are free/cheap (lower barrier to entry) and a ton of people play them, so there's just going to be a higher number of nasty people. People like their dickishness to be heard, so populous forums bring out the anonymous dicks. At least in CoD you're not hearing the dicks who couldn't afford the $60

How dare you on this site! Blasphemer!

And what does this all mean? His Pandaren Doubleagent is basically the only level 100 character who can't run endgame content.

Guess i owe you five buc—damnit i could have used that to buy some DLC!

Agreed there for sure.

That is exactly my point. Behavior while obeying the rules of gaming is subject to the rules of life, as with every other activity. That's why there's sportsmanship, etiquette, professionalism, courtesy, and many many other terms therefor.

So while many League players might come across as curt, rude, even hostile given the way they succinctly order each other around, they usually have a good reason for doing so. Even taking the time to type out a message to teammates—let alone a message longer than "come to bot" or a non-verbal ping—pulls you away from

They don't build a new court for the same reason a public bball court doesn't get new bleachers, etc. added to it. Free2Play for the win.

It blows some people's minds that their entertainment orbits around their time and effort, not the other way around.

The exact statement was "Profit is not necessary for infringement" (emphasis added). Profit does not have to exist for there to be a finding of infringement. It's definitely true that a huge motivation to infringe copyrights is profit, but it is not the case here, and this case is still infringement. Copyright is a

True, and i'd guess that, here, the image is the big issue. People who target kids fight tooth and nail against their characters getting Biebered (in real life, not the original image).

Hey i just replied with an overview of all the test factors to someone else, so sorry be lazy and just quote a section, but...

There's way more complexity for deciding how each factor applies in a particular case (thanks, law), but the basic idea is to CANE it: Character, Amount, Nature, and Effect.

Un-grey-lliarmus!